linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sunxi" <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] net: rfkill: gpio: add device tree support
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:50:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401211950.07011.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVeFuKFfAvSPYLmvWV5jjT-peZFJ8sJ2bbh4F=JAYoWLhjZpA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 21 January 2014, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >> As discussed earlier in this thread I'm not sure the con_id is
> >> suitable for labelling GPIOs. It'd be better to have a proper name
> >> specified in DT/ACPI instead.
> >
> > +1
> 
> I wonder why you guys prefer to have the name defined in the GPIO
> mapping. Having the driver decide the label makes it easier to look up
> which GPIO does what in debugfs, whereas nothing prevents people to
> name GPIOs whatever inadequate name they want in the device DT node.
> What am I overlooking here?

I should have another look at the debugfs representation, but isn't
there a global namespace that gets used for all gpios?  Neither the
con_id nor the name that the driver picks would be globally unique
and stable across kernel versions, so they don't make a good user
interface.

I think what we want here is a system-wide unique identifier for
each gpio line that may get represented in debugfs, and use a new
DT mechanism to communicate that.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-21 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-17  6:47 [PATCH RFC 0/6] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17  6:47 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] net: rfkill: gpio: fix gpio name buffer size off by 1 Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17  9:46   ` David Laight
2014-01-17  9:59     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17  6:47 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] net: rfkill: gpio: use clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17  6:47 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] net: rfkill: gpio: fix reversed clock enable state Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17  6:47 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] net: rfkill: gpio: add device tree support Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17 16:47   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 17:43     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17 20:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 23:11       ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-18  4:41         ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-20  8:10         ` Heikki Krogerus
2014-01-21  3:11         ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-01-21  9:35           ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-21 12:35             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 14:53               ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-01-21 15:25                 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-21 18:50                 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-01-22 12:38                   ` Mark Brown
2014-01-22  9:54                 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-22  9:58                 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-22 11:00                   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-27 14:24   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-01-29  4:01     ` [linux-sunxi] " Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17  6:47 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] net: rfkill: gpio: add clock-frequency device tree property Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17  6:47 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] ARM: sun7i: cubietruck: enable bluetooth module Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-01-17 20:26 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] net: rfkill: gpio: Add device tree support Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201401211950.07011.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).