* Re: [kbuild-all] [wireless-next:master 316/316] drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_debugfs.c:296 rsi_init_dbgfs() error: potential null dereference 'dev_dbgfs'. (kzalloc returns null)
[not found] ` <20140327154507.GA27177@mwanda>
@ 2014-03-27 16:01 ` Dan Carpenter
[not found] ` <CAG+h2qigvA+yfPt9iRv6eZCLppwFznuZ=Hdk5Yxr-EB_9WTQig@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-03-27 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fariya Fatima, kbuild, linux-wireless
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:45:07PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c:289 rsi_usb_write_register_multiple() warn: '__min2' 4096 can't fit into 255 'transfer'
The code for this one is:
transfer = min_t(int, count, 4096);
It's complaining because "tranfers" is u8, but the cast to int always
makes me worry negative values. In this case, count is not user
controlled so it's safe. But that's a common security problem you
should be aware of. It's better to cast it to an unsigned value.
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [kbuild-all] [wireless-next:master 316/316] drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_debugfs.c:296 rsi_init_dbgfs() error: potential null dereference 'dev_dbgfs'. (kzalloc returns null)
[not found] ` <CAG+h2qigvA+yfPt9iRv6eZCLppwFznuZ=Hdk5Yxr-EB_9WTQig@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2014-03-28 9:01 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2014-03-28 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fariya; +Cc: kbuild, linux-wireless
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 07:51:25AM +0530, Fariya wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Do I need to re-send the whole of the driver again? Considering the driver
> is a part of wireless-next, shall I check-out the wireless-next git repo
> and create a patch for the mentioned fixes and send it across?
The latter. Do it on top of wireles-next.
>
> > *The code for this one is: transfer = min_t(int, count, 4096); It's
> > complaining because "tranfers" is u8, but the cast to int always makes me
> > worry negative values. In this case, count is not user controlled so it's
> > safe. But that's a common security problem you should be aware of. It's
> > better to cast it to an unsigned value.*
>
> >Shall I typecast the return value of min_t to u8?
No. That would do a truncate to 8 bits before the compare. Cast it to
u32 first.
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-28 9:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <53275729.QHDAYltTUiN7HGNZ%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20140327154507.GA27177@mwanda>
2014-03-27 16:01 ` [kbuild-all] [wireless-next:master 316/316] drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_debugfs.c:296 rsi_init_dbgfs() error: potential null dereference 'dev_dbgfs'. (kzalloc returns null) Dan Carpenter
[not found] ` <CAG+h2qigvA+yfPt9iRv6eZCLppwFznuZ=Hdk5Yxr-EB_9WTQig@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-28 9:01 ` Dan Carpenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).