From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: devel@lists.open80211s.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TR: [RFC] 802.11s bitrate correction in airtime metric calculation
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:22:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140328132204.GB18560@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901734187@sbs2003.acksys.local>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:15:06AM +0100, Cedric VONCKEN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently using 802.11s for a project using openWrt mesh portals.
> All mesh points use 802.11a (non HT) and minstrel. Airtime metric uses a
> "rate"
> which is ultimately computed using sta->last_tx_rate from minstrel.
>
> This last_tx_rate is also updated by minstrel attempts at lower and
> higher speeds. Even if these occasional attempts are outnumbered by
> frames at max_tp_rate[0], they cause unexpected airtime metric
> variations resulting in unneeded mesh path changes.
> My idea is to use max_tp_rate[0] (from minstrel) instead. This rate is
> not subject to minstrel attempts and directly reflects the speed used
> for the vast majority of the frames.
Interesting -- I tried this exact thing once before, but got mixed results
in my testing.
Can you share your testing strategy?
It's true that last_tx_rate is sub-optimal here, but I feel like using
max_tp_rate directly is a layering violation. Many rate controllers
won't have that concept, and some rate controllers will exist entirely
in firmware. So I think perhaps fixing the concept of "last_tx_rate" or
adding a new "best_tx_rate" field that excludes probes and such might be
the way forward, rather than calling into the rate controllers.
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901734186@sbs2003.acksys.local>
[not found] ` <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901734187@sbs2003.acksys.local>
2014-03-28 13:22 ` Bob Copeland [this message]
2014-03-29 14:23 ` TR: [RFC] 802.11s bitrate correction in airtime metric calculation Antonio Quartulli
2014-03-29 18:43 ` Sergey Ryazanov
2014-03-30 9:49 ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-04-02 8:13 Cedric Debarge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140328132204.GB18560@localhost \
--to=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=devel@lists.open80211s.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).