From: James Cameron <quozl@laptop.org>
To: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Avinash Patil <patila@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: mwifiex: no wr_port available
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:26:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140514042654.GQ12785@us.netrek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430F70D87C6F@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:54:53PM -0700, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi James,
> [...]
> > You may be interested that rd_port also has possible leak when skb
> > cannot be allocated. See mwifiex_process_int_status:
> >
> > skb = dev_alloc_skb(rx_len);
> > if (!skb)
> > return -1;
> >
> > We have a hack in OLPC production arm-3.5 kernel which restores
> > rd_port bit, restores int_status.
> >
> > http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-kernel/commit/?h=arm-3.5&id=59fcaf10cce5bbdc370ec1c262b12aeb66ed1dca
>
> The rd_port/int_status change looks correct. But what issue did you
> encounter prior to applying the change "cache the read bitmap at the
> time of the interrupt rather than when the interrupt status bits are
> handled"?
No specific issue, instead ensuring that all effects are rolled back.
The effects of a call to mwifiex_process_int_status that returned -1
due to dev_alloc_skb fail were:
- change to curr_rd_port,
- bits cleared in mp_rd_bitmap,
So both effects were rolled back. Perhaps not needed?
I'm not recommending this as the right solution, because the patch
caused CPU loop during memory exhaustion, the interrupt came
back immediately. I added a hack to reduce impact of that:
http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-kernel/commit/?h=arm-3.5&id=491188ebd4721f3c8804b7fa626e63d6fdd2ed09
I did not have the experience to find out _why_ we could not
dev_alloc_skb, but at least was able to let the driver continue rather
than timeout.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 12:06 mwifiex: no wr_port available James Cameron
2014-05-14 2:52 ` Bing Zhao
2014-05-14 3:18 ` James Cameron
2014-05-14 3:54 ` Bing Zhao
2014-05-14 4:26 ` James Cameron [this message]
2014-05-14 4:55 ` Bing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140514042654.GQ12785@us.netrek.org \
--to=quozl@laptop.org \
--cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patila@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox