From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: Peter Oh <poh@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Replace ioread with wmb for data sync
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:30:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150128043005.GB24933@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C824DC.5080804@qca.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:53:00PM -0800, Peter Oh wrote:
> >>- /* IMPORTANT: this extra read transaction is required to
> >>- * flush the posted write buffer. */
> >>- (void)ath10k_pci_read32(ar, SOC_CORE_BASE_ADDRESS +
> >>- PCIE_INTR_ENABLE_ADDRESS);
> >>+ /* invoke data sync barrier */
> >>+ wmb();
> >> }
> >I am no expert in arcane PCI matters, but that looks suspicious to me. I seem
> >to recall wmb() only enforced ordering, and maybe not even memory-IO ordering
> >on all platforms. If you want to disable an irq, it really seems like you
> >would want to flush posted writes so you know the hardware has seen it.
> enforced ordering is happened by flush write buffer and wmb is
> commonly used to flush write buffer.
> so that wmb guarantees ordering by flush write buffer. That's why
> it's called a memory barrier.
Ok, sure, but I/O ordering two different writes, and ensuring device
has seen a posted write, are related but different things, no? So if
you are disabling an interrupt and want to be really sure interrupts
are off when function returns, I think you still want the read.
Anyway, it's your driver, just pointing out that the "IMPORTANT"
read might still be important to someone.
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-26 22:25 [PATCH] ath10k: Replace ioread with wmb for data sync Peter Oh
2015-01-27 21:33 ` Bob Copeland
2015-01-27 23:53 ` Peter Oh
2015-01-28 4:30 ` Bob Copeland [this message]
2015-01-28 5:39 ` Peter Oh
2015-01-28 7:37 ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-30 22:53 ` Peter Oh
2015-01-31 1:16 ` Sujith Manoharan
2015-01-31 1:56 ` Peter Oh
2015-01-31 2:06 ` Sujith Manoharan
2015-02-02 17:25 ` Peter Oh
2015-02-02 22:26 ` Adrian Chadd
2015-02-02 23:04 ` Peter Oh
2015-02-02 13:02 ` Johannes Berg
2015-02-02 17:33 ` Peter Oh
2015-02-02 18:54 ` Johannes Berg
2015-02-02 19:15 ` Peter Oh
2015-02-02 19:22 ` Johannes Berg
2015-02-02 19:36 ` Peter Oh
2015-02-02 19:47 ` Johannes Berg
2015-02-02 22:06 ` Peter Oh
2015-02-02 23:25 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-02-02 23:49 ` Peter Oh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150128043005.GB24933@localhost \
--to=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=poh@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).