From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [1/3] rt2x00usb: initialize the read value in case of failure
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:34:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150317083414.GA1276@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150316164100.GA6208@linutronix.de>
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-03-16 17:41:00 [+0100]:
Just an update:
…
>|ieee80211 phy0: rt2800usb_write_firmware: Info - Firmware loading not required - NIC in AutoRun mode
>|IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
>|IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
>switch to AP mode done.
>
>And this should be where it switches back to managed mode
>|ieee80211 phy0: rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x06 failed for offset 0x3200 with error -110 val: 0 type 40
>|ieee80211 phy0: rt2800usb_write_firmware: Info - Firmware is written.
so the difference is that I don't see "NIC in AutoRun mode". So
rt2800usb_autorun_detect() does not return 1 for some reason but 0
instead and whatever comes next kills the stick. Maybe it was tired of
of the wpa <-> hostapd mode switch for no reason.
So I told rt2800usb_autorun_detect() to always return 1 and not to care
what the stick says. The stick now runs for 12.5h in test without a
problem (that means it is able to connect to the AP and hostapd does not
complain, too). After around 11h I saw the message that it would write
the firmware (but it got ignored instead). So the workaround seems to
work.
I have no idea what AutoRun mode is (it seems that the stick already
has a firmware and is happy with it) and I have no clue why the firmware
decides to lie about it. I looked at the vendor driver I found at github
(which seems to be from 2012-10-22, DPO_RT5572_LinuxSTA_2.6.1.3) and
well, I look again if someone says it is worth looking… They seem to do
some kind "firmware is comming" magic which might be already done in the
current driver at a different spot but I think the main question is why
request is answered wrong. I *think* the vendor driver sends the
USB_MODE_AUTORUN request only once but it is hard to tell…
>>Kalle Valo
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-12 14:35 [PATCH 1/3] rt2x00usb: initialize the read value in case of failure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-12 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] rt2x00usb: check USB's request error code in rt2800usb_autorun_detect() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-12 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] rt2x00usb: drop rt2x00usb_disable_radio() from rt2800usb_disable_radio() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-16 16:06 ` [1/3] rt2x00usb: initialize the read value in case of failure Kalle Valo
2015-03-16 16:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-17 8:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2015-03-18 13:11 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2015-03-19 13:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-19 14:30 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2015-03-19 14:32 ` [PATCH] rt2800usb: check Autorun mode on FW load only once Stanislaw Gruszka
2015-03-30 8:29 ` Kalle Valo
2015-03-18 12:48 ` [1/3] rt2x00usb: initialize the read value in case of failure Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150317083414.GA1276@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).