From: "Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)" <hgujulan@visteon.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
"Babu, Viswanathan (V.)" <vbabu3@visteon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723au : remove goto & return error directly
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:49:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507134344.GA11599@IND12F0122> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150507121934.GH14154@mwanda>
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 03:19:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:03:06AM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > "Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)" <hgujulan@visteon.com> writes:
> > > Remove the goto and return error directly thereby removing a variable
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/rtl8723au/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 7 ++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > NACK!
>
> SHOUTING!
>
> >
> > The goto is cleaner and more consistent, rather than hiding a return in
> > the middle of the code.
>
> More consistent with what? There are already returns earlier in the
> function. Do-nothing gotos are pointless and annoying.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
I sent this patch because goto & return was mixed up in this function.
There was a return as well as goto used. And i guess goto is not
encouraged anywhere. In this case especially,I couldn't see any
significant cleanup being done in the goto label.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 11:22 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723au : remove goto & return error directly Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)
2015-05-07 12:03 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-05-07 12:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-07 13:49 ` Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.) [this message]
2015-05-07 14:09 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-05-12 10:37 ` Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)
2015-05-12 11:16 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-05-07 14:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2015-05-07 14:29 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-07 14:44 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150507134344.GA11599@IND12F0122 \
--to=hgujulan@visteon.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabu3@visteon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).