From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Raphaël Beamonte" <raphael.beamonte@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@atmel.com>, Dean Lee <dean.lee@atmel.com>,
Chris Park <chris.park@atmel.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@atmel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] staging: wilc1000: replace MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro to avoid possible memory leak
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:59:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150819025942.GD4588@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE_Gge0EDaE=zQp9YBDJSd_1VjU1a8-zoPkyKxqPc2THi2b=eQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:06:39PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
> 2015-08-18 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>:
> > To be honest, I have lost track of this patchset. If you are planning
> > to redo the other patches can you send it in a new thread?
>
> Actually, Greg already included the "return statement" and
> "DECLARE_WILC_BUFFER" ones.
> The replacement of printk by netdev_* needs more work on my side to
> get the net_device to be able to use the netdev_* functions.
> And apparently Greg already received another patch with the
> "FREE_WILC_BUFFER" replacement, though I don't see it in the
> staging-testing tree yet.
Maybe it was something else, but it would not apply. Please use git
rebase to figure it out and resend all of your outstanding patches, I
too am confused at this point.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-19 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-16 5:30 [PATCH 0/3] staging: wilc1000: code style patches Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-16 5:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: wilc1000: code style: fix macro with multiple statements Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 9:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-17 14:39 ` Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 0/5] staging: wilc1000: code improvements Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] staging: wilc1000: remove DECLARE_WILC_BUFFER() Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] staging: wilc1000: remove FREE_WILC_BUFFER() Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 17:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] staging: wilc1000: replace MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro to avoid possible memory leak Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 17:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging: wilc1000: use pr_* instead of printk Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 17:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-17 17:59 ` Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 18:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-17 16:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] staging: wilc1000: remove void function return statements that are not useful Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 19:28 ` [PATCHv2 0/5] staging: wilc1000: code improvements Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 19:28 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] staging: wilc1000: remove void function return statements that are not useful Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 19:28 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] staging: wilc1000: use pr_* instead of printk Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 19:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-08-17 23:06 ` [PATCHv3] staging: wilc1000: use netdev_* " Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-18 4:24 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-08-18 5:27 ` Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-18 6:10 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-08-19 2:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-08-17 19:28 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] staging: wilc1000: remove DECLARE_WILC_BUFFER() Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 19:28 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] staging: wilc1000: remove FREE_WILC_BUFFER() Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 20:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-08-17 19:28 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] staging: wilc1000: replace MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro to avoid possible memory leak Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 19:41 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-08-17 23:12 ` [PATCHv3] " Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 23:46 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-18 9:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-08-18 17:06 ` Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-19 2:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2015-08-19 3:14 ` [PATCHv4 0/2] staging: wilc1000: code improvements Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-19 3:14 ` [PATCHv4 1/2] staging: wilc1000: remove FREE_WILC_BUFFER() Raphaël Beamonte
2015-09-03 1:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-09-05 16:25 ` Raphaël Beamonte
2015-09-05 16:29 ` Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-19 3:14 ` [PATCHv4 2/2] staging: wilc1000: replace MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro to avoid possible memory leak Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-17 23:15 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] " Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-16 5:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: wilc1000: code style: fix globals initialized to false Raphaël Beamonte
2015-08-16 5:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: wilc1000: code style: fix open brace { on wrong line Raphaël Beamonte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150819025942.GD4588@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=chris.park@atmel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dean.lee@atmel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=johnny.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rachel.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=raphael.beamonte@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).