From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: Jesse Jones <jjones@cococorp.com>
Cc: Yeoh Chun-Yeow <yeohchunyeow@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: mesh - always do every discovery retry
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:14:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150908171406.GE18335@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fff70f4adca53a929cda056a21f4d3ad@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:05:06PM -0700, Jesse Jones wrote:
> > > My big worry is that we will select bad paths. And this *will* happen.
> > > I've seen it many times. And if it does happen the effects are not
> > > theoretical; they are by definition bad. We *have* selected a bad path
> > > after all. And when we select a bad path it will be very apparent to
> > > end users. Bandwidth will be lower than it should be and loss may go up
> > > as
> > well.
> >
> > Agreed with your point. How about adding nl80211 command for this?
>
> I'm not keen on the idea. I still think it's the right thing to do and I
> don't much like the idea of having to turn it on. And it will become an even
> better idea if we don't refresh as often (eventually I'll send a patch for
> that though I think I may have to massage what we're using now).
At the very least I think this is a change in semantics around
dot11MeshHWMPmaxPREQretries -- the intent as far as I know is to limit
total attempts to determine whether target is reachable at all, and I
don't think there is enough evidence in the standard to support the
other interpretation. In my opinion it's also somewhat confusing that a 'max'
parameter is used as a 'min'.
I could also see some users wanting different behavior here depending on
node density.
So, at the risk of having too many knobs, could we perhaps add another
tunable for this, call it min_preq_attempts or something, and fix it to the
interval [1, dot11MeshHWMPmaxPREQretries]? My preference would be to
maintain the default value of 1.
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-08 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-25 1:41 [PATCH] mac80211: mesh - always do every discovery retry Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-06-25 19:08 ` Jesse Jones
[not found] ` <4bd697c41f2bb66593c849246bde7b00@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-26 1:23 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-06-26 19:01 ` Jesse Jones
2015-06-26 19:37 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-06-26 20:05 ` Jesse Jones
2015-06-28 17:34 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-09-08 17:14 ` Bob Copeland [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-24 23:27 Alexis Green
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150908171406.GE18335@localhost \
--to=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=jjones@cococorp.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yeohchunyeow@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).