From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tony Cho <tony.cho@atmel.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, rachel.kim@atmel.com,
chris.park@atmel.com, austin.shin@atmel.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johnny.kim@atmel.com,
Nicolas.FERRE@atmel.com, adel.noureldin@atmel.com,
leo.kim@atmel.com, adham.abozaeid@atmel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: wilc1000: remove unused enum
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:25:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150914042506.GB26591@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F622F6.7010803@atmel.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:29:26AM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
>
>
> On 2015년 09월 12일 11:35, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:04:19PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
> >>From: Glen Lee <glen.lee@atmel.com>
> >>
> >>This patch removes a unused enum tenuFrameClass.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Glen Lee <glen.lee@atmel.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tony Cho <tony.cho@atmel.com>
> >>---
> >> drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c | 8 --------
> >> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> >I already applied this, why resend it?
> >
> >greg k-h
>
> This is one of series for the "[PATCH v2 2/2] staging: wilc1000: coreconfigurator.c: remove unused function".
> That's why it was sent to you.
But you sent it as a part of a different series, why do that?
When you do a v2 patch, please be specific, resend the whole series.
Otherwise how am I supposed to know what to do? Remember, I get
hundreds of patches to review and handle every day, you need to be very
obvious as to what I need to do otherwise I will get it wrong :)
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-14 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 3:04 [PATCH 0/2] resending v2 of the patch for coreconfigurator.c file Tony Cho
2015-09-11 3:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: wilc1000: remove unused enum Tony Cho
2015-09-12 2:35 ` Greg KH
2015-09-14 1:29 ` Tony Cho
2015-09-14 4:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
2015-09-14 4:37 ` Tony Cho
2015-09-11 3:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: wilc1000: coreconfigurator.c: remove unused functions Tony Cho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150914042506.GB26591@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Nicolas.FERRE@atmel.com \
--cc=adel.noureldin@atmel.com \
--cc=adham.abozaeid@atmel.com \
--cc=austin.shin@atmel.com \
--cc=chris.park@atmel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=johnny.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=leo.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rachel.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=tony.cho@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).