From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Chandra S Gorentla <csgorentla@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rachel.kim@atmel.com,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, chris.park@atmel.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johnny.kim@atmel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Check for errors before kfree
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:39:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151002133911.GP7289@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443791857-7837-1-git-send-email-csgorentla@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:47:35PM +0530, Chandra S Gorentla wrote:
> During the clean-up of the function, it is need to check if
> errors occurred, not the memory pointer.
>
The bug here is that we have a use after free on the success path. It
should have been mentioned in the changelog.
Anyway, this patch is buggy. If result == -EFAULT then it will crash.
Also this patch is really ugly. There is someone who is going to send a
correct fix (just add a return 0).
This driver usese "do everything" style error handling. It is a bug
prone anti-pattern because doing everything is more complicated than
doing one thing. You can easily see it is bug prone, because it made
you introduce a bug, right?
Instead the error handling should look like this:
return 0;
err_free_msg:
kfree(pstrMessage);
return ret;
There are no error paths where we need to free "pstrMessage->pvBuffer"
but if we were to add one it would look like this:
return 0;
err_pvbuffer:
kfree(pstrMessage->pvBuffer);
err_msg:
kfree(pstrMessage);
return ret;
This is a minimal, uncomplicated, no indenting, no if statement way of
unwinding.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-02 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 13:17 [PATCH 1/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Check for errors before kfree Chandra S Gorentla
2015-10-02 13:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Remove ineffective code Chandra S Gorentla
2015-10-02 13:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Do not return from function with lock is on Chandra S Gorentla
2015-10-02 13:39 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-10-03 2:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: Check for errors before kfree Chandra Gorentla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151002133911.GP7289@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=chris.park@atmel.com \
--cc=csgorentla@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johnny.kim@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rachel.kim@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).