From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
Cc: brudley@broadcom.com, arend@broadcom.com, frankyl@broadcom.com,
meuleman@broadcom.com, pieterpg@broadcom.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com,
hui.wang@canonical.com
Subject: Re: brcmfmac: Remove waitqueue_active check
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:58:22 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310125822.6F63E60DB3@smtp.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457508326-24420-1-git-send-email-hui.wang@canonical.com>
> We met a problem of pm_suspend when repeated closing/opening the lid
> on a Lenovo laptop (1/20 reproduce rate), below is the log:
>
> [ 199.735876] PM: Entering mem sleep
> [ 199.750516] e1000e: EEE TX LPI TIMER: 00000011
> [ 199.856638] Trying to free nonexistent resource <000000000000d000-000000000000d0ff>
> [ 201.753566] brcmfmac: brcmf_pcie_suspend: Timeout on response for entering D3 substate
> [ 201.753581] pci_legacy_suspend(): brcmf_pcie_suspend+0x0/0x1f0 [brcmfmac] returns -5
> [ 201.753585] dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x160 returns -5
> [ 201.753589] PM: Device 0000:04:00.0 failed to suspend async: error -5
>
> Through debugging, we found when problem happens, it is not the device
> fails to enter D3, but the signal D3_ACK comes too early to pass the
> waitqueue_active() check.
>
> Just like this:
> brcmf_pcie_send_mb_data(devinfo, BRCMF_H2D_HOST_D3_INFORM);
> // signal is triggered here
> wait_event_timeout(devinfo->mbdata_resp_wait, devinfo->mbdata_completed,
> BRCMF_PCIE_MBDATA_TIMEOUT);
>
> So far I think it is safe to remove waitqueue_active check since there
> is only one place to trigger this signal (sending
> BRCMF_H2D_HOST_D3_INFORM). And it is not a problem calling wake_up
> event earlier than calling wait_event.
>
> Cc: Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Franky (Zhenhui) Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers-next.git.
Kalle Valo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-09 7:25 [PATCH] brcmfmac: Remove waitqueue_active check Hui Wang
2016-03-09 9:14 ` Hante Meuleman
2016-03-10 12:58 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160310125822.6F63E60DB3@smtp.codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=pieterpg@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).