linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] rt2x00usb: Use usb anchors to manage URB
@ 2016-03-16 17:28 Vishal Thanki
  2016-03-17  8:43 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vishal Thanki @ 2016-03-16 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sgruszka, helmut.schaa, linux-wireless; +Cc: Vishal Thanki

With current driver, it is observed that a URB is not
completed while the USB disconnect is initiated. Due to
that, the URB completion hanlder is trying to access
the resource which was freed as a part of USB disconnect.
Managing the URBs with anchors will make sure that all
the URBs are handled gracefully before device gets
disconnected.

Signed-off-by: Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c
index 7627af6..a2ed3e1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00usb.c
@@ -34,6 +34,15 @@
 /*
  * Interfacing with the HW.
  */
+
+struct rt2x00usb_anchors {
+	struct usb_anchor async_urb;
+	struct usb_anchor tx_submitted;
+	struct usb_anchor rx_submitted;
+};
+
+static struct rt2x00usb_anchors *anchors;
+
 int rt2x00usb_vendor_request(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
 			     const u8 request, const u8 requesttype,
 			     const u16 offset, const u16 value,
@@ -171,8 +180,11 @@ static void rt2x00usb_register_read_async_cb(struct urb *urb)
 {
 	struct rt2x00_async_read_data *rd = urb->context;
 	if (rd->callback(rd->rt2x00dev, urb->status, le32_to_cpu(rd->reg))) {
-		if (usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC) < 0)
+		usb_anchor_urb(urb, &anchors->async_urb);
+		if (usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC) < 0) {
+			usb_unanchor_urb(urb);
 			kfree(rd);
+		}
 	} else
 		kfree(rd);
 }
@@ -206,8 +218,11 @@ void rt2x00usb_register_read_async(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
 	usb_fill_control_urb(urb, usb_dev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(usb_dev, 0),
 			     (unsigned char *)(&rd->cr), &rd->reg, sizeof(rd->reg),
 			     rt2x00usb_register_read_async_cb, rd);
-	if (usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC) < 0)
+	usb_anchor_urb(urb, &anchors->async_urb);
+	if (usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC) < 0) {
+		usb_unanchor_urb(urb);
 		kfree(rd);
+	}
 	usb_free_urb(urb);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt2x00usb_register_read_async);
@@ -313,8 +328,10 @@ static bool rt2x00usb_kick_tx_entry(struct queue_entry *entry, void *data)
 			  entry->skb->data, length,
 			  rt2x00usb_interrupt_txdone, entry);
 
+	usb_anchor_urb(entry_priv->urb, &anchors->tx_submitted);
 	status = usb_submit_urb(entry_priv->urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (status) {
+		usb_unanchor_urb(entry_priv->urb);
 		if (status == -ENODEV)
 			clear_bit(DEVICE_STATE_PRESENT, &rt2x00dev->flags);
 		set_bit(ENTRY_DATA_IO_FAILED, &entry->flags);
@@ -402,8 +419,10 @@ static bool rt2x00usb_kick_rx_entry(struct queue_entry *entry, void *data)
 			  entry->skb->data, entry->skb->len,
 			  rt2x00usb_interrupt_rxdone, entry);
 
+	usb_anchor_urb(entry_priv->urb, &anchors->rx_submitted);
 	status = usb_submit_urb(entry_priv->urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (status) {
+		usb_unanchor_urb(entry_priv->urb);
 		if (status == -ENODEV)
 			clear_bit(DEVICE_STATE_PRESENT, &rt2x00dev->flags);
 		set_bit(ENTRY_DATA_IO_FAILED, &entry->flags);
@@ -818,6 +837,14 @@ int rt2x00usb_probe(struct usb_interface *usb_intf,
 	if (retval)
 		goto exit_free_reg;
 
+	anchors = devm_kmalloc(&usb_dev->dev, sizeof(struct rt2x00usb_anchors),
+			       GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!anchors)
+		goto exit_free_reg;
+
+	init_usb_anchor(&anchors->async_urb);
+	init_usb_anchor(&anchors->tx_submitted);
+	init_usb_anchor(&anchors->rx_submitted);
 	return 0;
 
 exit_free_reg:
@@ -840,6 +867,10 @@ void rt2x00usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *usb_intf)
 	struct ieee80211_hw *hw = usb_get_intfdata(usb_intf);
 	struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev = hw->priv;
 
+	usb_kill_anchored_urbs(&anchors->async_urb);
+	usb_kill_anchored_urbs(&anchors->tx_submitted);
+	usb_kill_anchored_urbs(&anchors->rx_submitted);
+
 	/*
 	 * Free all allocated data.
 	 */
-- 
2.4.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rt2x00usb: Use usb anchors to manage URB
  2016-03-16 17:28 [PATCH] rt2x00usb: Use usb anchors to manage URB Vishal Thanki
@ 2016-03-17  8:43 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
  2016-03-17  9:53   ` Vishal Thanki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stanislaw Gruszka @ 2016-03-17  8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vishal Thanki; +Cc: helmut.schaa, linux-wireless

Hi

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:28:51PM +0100, Vishal Thanki wrote:
> +struct rt2x00usb_anchors {
> +	struct usb_anchor async_urb;
> +	struct usb_anchor tx_submitted;
> +	struct usb_anchor rx_submitted;
> +};

I don't think we need 3 different usb_anchor's, one should be
enough.

> +static struct rt2x00usb_anchors *anchors;

usb_anchor structure should be embedded in rt2x00_dev structure,
otherwise you can kill urb's from other rt2x00 devices, when
disconnecting another one.

Stanislaw

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rt2x00usb: Use usb anchors to manage URB
  2016-03-17  8:43 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
@ 2016-03-17  9:53   ` Vishal Thanki
  2016-03-17 11:28     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vishal Thanki @ 2016-03-17  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislaw Gruszka; +Cc: helmut.schaa, linux-wireless

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:43:32AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:28:51PM +0100, Vishal Thanki wrote:
> > +struct rt2x00usb_anchors {
> > +	struct usb_anchor async_urb;
> > +	struct usb_anchor tx_submitted;
> > +	struct usb_anchor rx_submitted;
> > +};
> 
> I don't think we need 3 different usb_anchor's, one should be
> enough.
> 

Ok, I will change that.

> > +static struct rt2x00usb_anchors *anchors;
> 
> usb_anchor structure should be embedded in rt2x00_dev structure,
> otherwise you can kill urb's from other rt2x00 devices, when
> disconnecting another one.
> 

rt2x00_dev structure does not contain any bus specific data structures
(for example no structures present for USB/PCI). Should I add a void
*ptr in rt2x00_dev and cast it as usb_anchor in rt2x00usb.c?

Thanks,
Vishal

> Stanislaw

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] rt2x00usb: Use usb anchors to manage URB
  2016-03-17  9:53   ` Vishal Thanki
@ 2016-03-17 11:28     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stanislaw Gruszka @ 2016-03-17 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vishal Thanki; +Cc: helmut.schaa, linux-wireless

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Vishal Thanki wrote:
> > usb_anchor structure should be embedded in rt2x00_dev structure,
> > otherwise you can kill urb's from other rt2x00 devices, when
> > disconnecting another one.
> > 
> 
> rt2x00_dev structure does not contain any bus specific data structures
> (for example no structures present for USB/PCI). Should I add a void
> *ptr in rt2x00_dev and cast it as usb_anchor in rt2x00usb.c?

No, just add usb_anchor to rt2x00_dev (and include proper header if
needed).

Stanislaw

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-17 11:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-16 17:28 [PATCH] rt2x00usb: Use usb anchors to manage URB Vishal Thanki
2016-03-17  8:43 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-03-17  9:53   ` Vishal Thanki
2016-03-17 11:28     ` Stanislaw Gruszka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).