From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Mathias Kresin <dev@kresin.me>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: add support for mac addr from device tree
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:19:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160825131907.GA7834@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABwW5nkxpX_SsCorU0kuuOVDcNP5QARdyTbP=AWM5=QTZOW=eA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:12:22PM +0200, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> 2016-08-25 11:33 GMT+02:00 Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:19:22AM +0200, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> > > The EEPROM used on some CPEs has for every device the same generic
> > > ralink mac in EEPROM and needs to be overridden.
> >
> > I don't know what is CPE, but even if I would know that, I most likely
> > sill will not understand that description.
>
> Well, seams to me the commit message can be improved. If a v2 is
> required or a v2 is required because of the commit message, I'll take
> care of it.
Please do.
> CPE = Customer Premises Equipment or the small plastic box from your
> ISP at home. The whole point of the patch is that the MAC stored in
> the wifi EEPROM might not be unique and need to be overridden. I'm
> aware of three different "home router", where each model has the same
> generic ralink MAC address stored in the wifi EEPROM. This can cause
> nasty issues.
I think we still want MAC from EEPROM instead of random one on systems
without OF. Otherwise we could just use random MAC every time, but this
does not seems lika a good idea.
Can we check against that particular MAC that repeats on those CPEs and
if it match use random one ? Or use some other identification to find
out that EEPROM MAC is not good ?
> > Shouldn't use dev_of_node(&rt2x00dev->dev) and check against NULL ?
>
> Not sure if dev_of_node() is meant to be used by every driver. Or at
> least the function is only used by base stuff and not by any driver.
>
> The NULL check doesn't seam to me required. The of_node is finally
> passed to __of_find_property which does the NULL check before using
> of_node.
Ok.
Thanks
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-25 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 8:19 [PATCH] rt2x00: add support for mac addr from device tree Mathias Kresin
2016-08-25 9:33 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2016-08-25 11:12 ` Mathias Kresin
2016-08-25 13:19 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2016-08-25 15:03 ` Mathias Kresin
2016-08-25 15:18 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160825131907.GA7834@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@kresin.me \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).