From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Cathy Luo <cluo@marvell.com>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [v4,2/2] mwifiex: add cfg80211 testmode support
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:40:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160831194003.GA31478@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469525960-6643-2-git-send-email-akarwar@marvell.com>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:09:20PM +0530, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> From: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
>
> This patch adds cfg80211 testmode support so that userspace tools can
> download necessary commands to firmware during manufacturing mode tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xinming <huxm@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
> ---
> v4: Used cfg80211 testmode interface instead of wext in 2/2 patch.(Kalle Valo)
> v3: Add "select WIRELESS_EXT" in Kconfig to resolve kbuild test robot errors.
> WEXT_PRIV seems to have a dependency with WIRELESS_EXT.
> v2: 1) Sequence of these two patches are changed to resolve compilation
> error seen if only 1/2 is applied.
> 2) Add "select WEXT_PRIV" in Kconfig to resolve warnings reported by
> kbuild test robot.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> index 235fb39..86b31b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> @@ -3919,6 +3919,88 @@ static int mwifiex_cfg80211_get_channel(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NL80211_TESTMODE
> +
> +enum mwifiex_tm_attr {
> + __MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_INVALID = 0,
> + MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_CMD = 1,
> + MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_DATA = 2,
> +
> + /* keep last */
> + __MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_AFTER_LAST,
> + MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_MAX = __MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_AFTER_LAST - 1,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct nla_policy mwifiex_tm_policy[MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
> + [MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_CMD] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> + [MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_DATA] = { .type = NLA_BINARY,
> + .len = MWIFIEX_SIZE_OF_CMD_BUFFER },
> +};
> +
> +enum mwifiex_tm_cmd {
> + MWIFIEX_TM_CMD_HOSTCMD = 0,
> +};
> +
> +int mwifiex_tm_cmd(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev,
This function should be static, no?
Brian
> + void *data, int len)
> +{
> + struct mwifiex_private *priv = mwifiex_netdev_get_priv(wdev->netdev);
> + struct mwifiex_ds_misc_cmd *hostcmd;
> + struct nlattr *tb[MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_MAX + 1];
> + struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!priv)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + adapter = priv->adapter;
> +
> + err = nla_parse(tb, MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_MAX, data, len,
> + mwifiex_tm_policy);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (!tb[MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_CMD])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + switch (nla_get_u32(tb[MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_CMD])) {
> + case MWIFIEX_TM_CMD_HOSTCMD:
> + if (!tb[MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_DATA])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + hostcmd = kzalloc(sizeof(*hostcmd), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!hostcmd)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + hostcmd->len = nla_len(tb[MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_DATA]);
> + memcpy(hostcmd->cmd, nla_data(tb[MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_DATA]),
> + hostcmd->len);
> +
> + if (mwifiex_send_cmd(priv, 0, 0, 0, hostcmd, true)) {
> + dev_err(priv->adapter->dev, "Failed to process hostcmd\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + /* process hostcmd response*/
> + skb = cfg80211_testmode_alloc_reply_skb(wiphy, hostcmd->len);
> + if (!skb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + err = nla_put(skb, MWIFIEX_TM_ATTR_DATA,
> + hostcmd->len, hostcmd->cmd);
> + if (err) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> + }
> +
> + err = cfg80211_testmode_reply(skb);
> + kfree(hostcmd);
> + return err;
> + default:
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int
> mwifiex_cfg80211_start_radar_detection(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> struct net_device *dev,
> @@ -4031,6 +4113,7 @@ static struct cfg80211_ops mwifiex_cfg80211_ops = {
> .tdls_cancel_channel_switch = mwifiex_cfg80211_tdls_cancel_chan_switch,
> .add_station = mwifiex_cfg80211_add_station,
> .change_station = mwifiex_cfg80211_change_station,
> + CFG80211_TESTMODE_CMD(mwifiex_tm_cmd)
> .get_channel = mwifiex_cfg80211_get_channel,
> .start_radar_detection = mwifiex_cfg80211_start_radar_detection,
> .channel_switch = mwifiex_cfg80211_channel_switch,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 9:39 [PATCH v4 1/2] mwifiex: add manufacturing mode support Amitkumar Karwar
2016-07-26 9:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mwifiex: add cfg80211 testmode support Amitkumar Karwar
2016-08-31 19:40 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2016-09-02 7:40 ` [v4,2/2] " Amitkumar Karwar
2016-08-31 19:34 ` [v4,1/2] mwifiex: add manufacturing mode support Brian Norris
2016-09-02 7:39 ` Amitkumar Karwar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160831194003.GA31478@localhost \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=akarwar@marvell.com \
--cc=cluo@marvell.com \
--cc=huxm@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishants@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).