From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nl80211: fix sched scan netlink socket owner destruction
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:00:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105100012.6884-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
A single netlink socket might own multiple interfaces *and* a
scheduled scan request (which might belong to another interface),
so when it goes away both may need to be destroyed.
Remove the schedule_scan_stop indirection to fix this - it's only
needed for interface destruction because of the way this works
right now, with a single work taking care of all interfaces.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 93a1e86ce10e4 ("nl80211: Stop scheduled scan if netlink client disappears")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 3df85a751a85..ef5eff93a8b8 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -14502,13 +14502,17 @@ static int nl80211_netlink_notify(struct notifier_block * nb,
list_for_each_entry_rcu(rdev, &cfg80211_rdev_list, list) {
bool schedule_destroy_work = false;
- bool schedule_scan_stop = false;
struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request *sched_scan_req =
rcu_dereference(rdev->sched_scan_req);
if (sched_scan_req && notify->portid &&
- sched_scan_req->owner_nlportid == notify->portid)
- schedule_scan_stop = true;
+ sched_scan_req->owner_nlportid == notify->portid) {
+ sched_scan_req->owner_nlportid = 0;
+
+ if (rdev->ops->sched_scan_stop &&
+ rdev->wiphy.flags & WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SCAN)
+ schedule_work(&rdev->sched_scan_stop_wk);
+ }
list_for_each_entry_rcu(wdev, &rdev->wiphy.wdev_list, list) {
cfg80211_mlme_unregister_socket(wdev, notify->portid);
@@ -14539,12 +14543,6 @@ static int nl80211_netlink_notify(struct notifier_block * nb,
spin_unlock(&rdev->destroy_list_lock);
schedule_work(&rdev->destroy_work);
}
- } else if (schedule_scan_stop) {
- sched_scan_req->owner_nlportid = 0;
-
- if (rdev->ops->sched_scan_stop &&
- rdev->wiphy.flags & WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SCAN)
- schedule_work(&rdev->sched_scan_stop_wk);
}
}
--
2.9.3
reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170105100012.6884-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox