From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:60310 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752708AbdBUVAX (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:00:23 -0500
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:00:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20170221.160021.1073072045887279629.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20170221_220058_030416_18618B5E)
To: kvalo@codeaurora.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jikos@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath10k regression on XPS13
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <87poibb9ze.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
References: <87y3wzbd8n.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
        <20170221.135337.291678413491553794.davem@davemloft.net>
        <87poibb9ze.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:49:09 +0200

> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> 
>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200
>>
>>> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
>>> 
>>>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
>>>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.
>>>>
>>>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
>>>> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
>>>>
>>>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.
>>> 
>>> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant
>>> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit
>>> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the
>>> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291.
>>> 
>>> Does that sound ok to you?
>>
>> Sure.
> 
> Here's the revert:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/730735/
> 
> I didn't send a pull request because that felt overkill to do just for
> one patch.

Yep, that's fine.