From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@google.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>,
rajatja@google.com, Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>,
Cathy Luo <cluo@marvell.com>, Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [3/3] mwifiex: pcie: avoid hardcode wifi-only firmware name
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:47:11 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170405104711.32CD460DA5@smtp.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490865547-10208-3-git-send-email-huxinming820@gmail.com>
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
>
> Wifi-only firmware name should be chipset specific.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
The commit log is not telling anything. Why are you changing this? And how does
the functionality change from user space point of view?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9653387/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 9:19 [PATCH 1/3] mwifiex: remove unnecessary wakeup interrupt number sanity check Xinming Hu
2017-03-30 9:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] mwifiex: using general print function during device intialization Xinming Hu
2017-03-31 22:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-04-03 18:42 ` Brian Norris
2017-04-05 6:41 ` Xinming Hu
2017-03-30 9:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] mwifiex: pcie: avoid hardcode wifi-only firmware name Xinming Hu
2017-03-31 22:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-04-03 18:48 ` Brian Norris
2017-04-06 8:08 ` [EXT] " Xinming Hu
2017-04-06 8:05 ` Xinming Hu
2017-04-05 10:47 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
[not found] ` <20170405104711.1092260DC7@smtp.codeaurora.org>
2017-04-06 8:14 ` RE:] Re: [3/3] " Xinming Hu
2017-03-31 22:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] mwifiex: remove unnecessary wakeup interrupt number sanity check Dmitry Torokhov
2017-04-03 18:33 ` Brian Norris
2017-04-05 5:23 ` Xinming Hu
2017-04-05 5:16 ` [EXT] " Xinming Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170405104711.32CD460DA5@smtp.codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akarwar@marvell.com \
--cc=briannorris@google.com \
--cc=cluo@marvell.com \
--cc=dtor@google.com \
--cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
--cc=huxm@marvell.com \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).