From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pablo@netfilter.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] netlink: pass extended ACK struct to parsing functions
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:56:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412135608.GG1952@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170412123408.22012-5-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:34:07PM CEST, johannes@sipsolutions.net wrote:
>From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
>
>Pass the new extended ACK reporting struct to all of the
>generic netlink parsing functions. For now, pass NULL in
>almost all callers (except for some in the core.)
>
>Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
>---
[...]
>diff --git a/lib/nlattr.c b/lib/nlattr.c
>index b42b8577fc23..a7e0b16078df 100644
>--- a/lib/nlattr.c
>+++ b/lib/nlattr.c
>@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int maxtype,
> * @len: length of attribute stream
> * @maxtype: maximum attribute type to be expected
> * @policy: validation policy
>+ * @extack: extended ACK report struct
> *
> * Validates all attributes in the specified attribute stream against the
> * specified policy. Attributes with a type exceeding maxtype will be
>@@ -120,20 +121,23 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int maxtype,
> * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code.
> */
> int nla_validate(const struct nlattr *head, int len, int maxtype,
>- const struct nla_policy *policy)
>+ const struct nla_policy *policy,
>+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> const struct nlattr *nla;
>- int rem, err;
>+ int rem;
>
> nla_for_each_attr(nla, head, len, rem) {
>- err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy);
>- if (err < 0)
>- goto errout;
>+ int err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy);
>+
>+ if (err < 0) {
You can just check:
if (err)
while you are at it. validate_nla never returns positive
value.
Btw, unrelated to this patch, I find it odd to have 2 functions:
nla_validate
validate_nla
Confusing :)
>+ if (extack)
>+ extack->bad_attr = nla;
>+ return err;
>+ }
> }
>
>- err = 0;
>-errout:
>- return err;
>+ return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nla_validate);
>
>@@ -180,7 +184,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nla_policy_len);
> * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code.
> */
> int nla_parse(struct nlattr **tb, int maxtype, const struct nlattr *head,
>- int len, const struct nla_policy *policy)
>+ int len, const struct nla_policy *policy,
>+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> const struct nlattr *nla;
> int rem, err;
>@@ -193,8 +198,11 @@ int nla_parse(struct nlattr **tb, int maxtype, const struct nlattr *head,
> if (type > 0 && type <= maxtype) {
> if (policy) {
> err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy);
>- if (err < 0)
>+ if (err < 0) {
Same here.
>+ if (extack)
>+ extack->bad_attr = nla;
> goto errout;
>+ }
> }
>
> tb[type] = (struct nlattr *)nla;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 12:34 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] netlink extended ACK reporting Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 12:34 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] netlink: " Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 13:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 15:06 ` David Ahern
2017-04-12 15:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 15:28 ` David Miller
2017-04-12 15:21 ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 15:30 ` David Miller
2017-04-12 15:32 ` David Ahern
2017-04-12 12:34 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] genetlink: pass extended ACK report down Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 14:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 12:34 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] netlink: allow sending extended ACK with cookie on success Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 13:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 13:54 ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 12:34 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] netlink: pass extended ACK struct to parsing functions Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 13:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 13:20 ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 13:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 14:02 ` Kalle Valo
2017-04-12 14:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 13:56 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-04-12 12:34 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] netlink: pass extended ACK struct where available Johannes Berg
2017-04-12 14:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 14:55 ` David Ahern
2017-04-12 15:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-04-12 15:29 ` David Miller
2017-04-12 14:57 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] netlink extended ACK reporting David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170412135608.GG1952@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).