From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WPA and WPA2
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 08:43:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170524224346.GD2319@eros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495644240.12939.3.camel@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:44:00AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 17:34 +1000, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:27:50PM +1000, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am attempting to rewrite the ks7010 WEXT driver
> > > (drivers/staging/ks7010)
> > > to use the CFG80211 API.
> > >
> > > I am reading 802.11 Wireless Networks - Matthew S. Gast for
> > > reference.
> > >
> > > I have some confusion regarding WEP/WPA/WPA2/RSN, ciphers, keys and
> > > ie's?
> > >
> > > As I understand, first there was WEP. Next we got a marketing term
> > > WPA
> > > which referred to 802.11i (which specified the protocols TKIP and
> > > CCMP, and also RSN).
> > >
> > > WEP vs WPA
> > > ----------
> > >
> > > To add to my confusion the ks7010 code seemingly mixes up the use
> > > of
> > > WEP keys and WPA keys, to set both the WEP and the WPA keys the
> > > driver
> > > uses the same MIB requests? Yet throughout the code WEP keys and
> > > WPA
> > > keys are stored in separate structures (and treated differently).
> >
> > Oh, I just got why there is only one MIB request type - there are
> > only
> > one set of keys used by the target
> >
> > DOT11_WEP_DEFAULT_KEY_VALUE1 = 0x13020101,
> > DOT11_WEP_DEFAULT_KEY_VALUE2 = 0x13020102,
> > DOT11_WEP_DEFAULT_KEY_VALUE3 = 0x13020103,
> > DOT11_WEP_DEFAULT_KEY_VALUE4 = 0x13020104,
> >
> > removing 'WEP' from the defines removes the confusion here :)
>
> I could be entirely wrong, but it looks like the driver really just
> defines 4 "keys" which can be used for anything.
Thank you very much for taking the time to look at the driver, I
really appreciate it.
> For WEP, they are the 4 WEP key indexes.
>
> For RSN, they are 1 = PMK, 2 = GMK, 3 = GMK2, 4 seems unused.
>
> Because WEXT is pretty convoluted, I woudn't necessarily try to
> translate what eg ks_wlan_set_encode_ext() is doing directly to
> cfg80211, but to understand how the firmware interface works and then
> just write the cfg80211 code to the firmware interface.
That's a good idea.
thanks,
Tobin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-24 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 7:27 WPA and WPA2 Tobin C. Harding
2017-05-24 7:34 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-05-24 16:44 ` Dan Williams
2017-05-24 18:06 ` Johannes Berg
2017-05-24 22:40 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-05-25 17:45 ` Dan Williams
2017-05-28 21:30 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-05-26 8:32 ` Johannes Berg
2017-05-24 22:43 ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]
2017-05-24 7:40 ` Johannes Berg
2017-05-24 10:13 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-05-24 10:47 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170524224346.GD2319@eros \
--to=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).