linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org>
Cc: arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, franky.lin@broadcom.com,
	brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, mnissler@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [V3,1/3] brcmfmac: Avoid possible out-of-bounds read
Date: Mon,  2 Oct 2017 14:07:56 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171002140756.7086460B72@smtp.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917040824.22237-1-cernekee@chromium.org>

Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org> wrote:

> In brcmf_p2p_notify_rx_mgmt_p2p_probereq(), chanspec is assigned before
> the length of rxframe is validated.  This could lead to uninitialized
> data being accessed (but not printed).  Since we already have a
> perfectly good endian-swapped copy of rxframe->chanspec in ch.chspec,
> and ch.chspec is not modified by decchspec(), avoid the extra
> assignment and use ch.chspec in the debug print.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mattias Nissler <mnissler@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>

2 patches applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

73f2c8e933b1 brcmfmac: Avoid possible out-of-bounds read
a7c9acc452b2 brcmfmac: Delete redundant length check

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9954603/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-17  4:08 [PATCH V3 1/3] brcmfmac: Avoid possible out-of-bounds read Kevin Cernekee
2017-09-17  4:08 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] brcmfmac: Delete redundant length check Kevin Cernekee
2017-09-17  4:08 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] brcmfmac: Add check for short event packets Kevin Cernekee
2017-10-02 12:46   ` [V3,3/3] " Kalle Valo
2017-10-02 13:51   ` Kalle Valo
2017-10-02 14:07 ` Kalle Valo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171002140756.7086460B72@smtp.codeaurora.org \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=cernekee@chromium.org \
    --cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mnissler@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).