Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	venkateswara.kaja@microchip.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	ganesh.krishna@microchip.com, adham.abozaeid@microchip.com,
	aditya.shankar@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: wilc1000: modified wilc_spi_read_int() by using GENMASK macro
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:37:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222073731.ambug44zxpmwm76w@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519229532-11265-3-git-send-email-ajay.kathat@microchip.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:42:10PM +0530, Ajay Singh wrote:
> Use existing macro GENMASK to get the bitmask value. Moved the code to
> get the bitmask value outside the loop, as its only required one time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> index 131d2b7..c63f534 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
> @@ -955,6 +955,7 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status)
>  	tmp = (byte_cnt >> 2) & IRQ_DMA_WD_CNT_MASK;
>  
>  	j = 0;
> +	unknown_mask = GENMASK(g_spi.nint - 1, 0);
>  	do {
>  		wilc_spi_read_reg(wilc, 0x1a90, &irq_flags);
>  		tmp |= ((irq_flags >> 27) << IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET);
> @@ -964,8 +965,6 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status)
>  			tmp |= (((irq_flags >> 0) & 0x7) << k);
>  		}
>  
> -		unknown_mask = ~((1ul << g_spi.nint) - 1);
> -

This isn't right at all...  Say g_spi.nint is zero, then we're doing
GENMASK(-1, 0) which seems like it should be undefined.  If g_spi.nint
is 1 then "GENMASK(1 - 1, 0)" is 0x1 but "~((1 < 1) - 1)" is ~0x1.

I'm done reviewing this patch series...  You need to be more careful.
Create a small test program to test your patches.  As a reviewer,
creating test programs is how I review your patches.

#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "/home/dcarpenter/progs/smatch/devel/check_debug.h"
#include "kernel.h"
#include <assert.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <linux/blktrace_api.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>

#define BITS_PER_LONG 64
#define GENMASK(h, l) \
        (((~0UL) - (1UL << (l)) + 1) & (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))

int main(void)
{
        int i;
        u32 mask1, mask2;

        for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
                mask1 = ~((1ul << i) - 1);
                mask2 = GENMASK(i - 1, 0);
                if (mask1 == mask2)
                        continue;
                printf("ONE 0x%x %d\n", mask1, i);
                printf("TWO 0x%x\n", mask2);
        }
        return 0;
}

regards,
dan carpenter

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-21 16:12 [PATCH 0/4] staging: wilc1000: modify functions by making use of GENMASK macro Ajay Singh
2018-02-21 16:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] staging: wilc1000: remove use of 'happened' variable in wilc_spi_read_int() Ajay Singh
2018-02-22  7:20   ` Dan Carpenter
2018-02-22  8:39     ` Ajay Singh
2018-02-22  9:04       ` Dan Carpenter
2018-02-21 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] staging: wilc1000: modified wilc_spi_read_int() by using GENMASK macro Ajay Singh
2018-02-22  7:37   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2018-02-22  9:23     ` Claudiu Beznea
2018-02-22  9:28       ` Claudiu Beznea
2018-02-21 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] staging: wilc1000: refactor wilc_spi_clear_int_ext() " Ajay Singh
2018-02-22  7:49   ` Dan Carpenter
2018-02-21 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] staging: wilc1000: refactor sdio_clear_int_ext() " Ajay Singh
2018-02-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] staging: wilc1000: modify functions by making use of " Ajay Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180222073731.ambug44zxpmwm76w@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=adham.abozaeid@microchip.com \
    --cc=aditya.shankar@microchip.com \
    --cc=ajay.kathat@microchip.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=ganesh.krishna@microchip.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkateswara.kaja@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox