* [PATCH] ath10k: Protect ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free with rx_ring.lock
@ 2018-06-07 16:11 greearb
2018-06-14 9:12 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: greearb @ 2018-06-07 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath10k, kvalo; +Cc: linux-wireless, Ben Greear
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
While debugging driver crashes related to a buggy firmware
crashing under load, I noticed that ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free
could be called without being under lock. I'm not sure if this
is the root cause of the crash or not, but it seems prudent to
protect it.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
index d74901d..963ddc1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
@@ -266,11 +266,12 @@ int ath10k_htt_rx_ring_refill(struct ath10k *ar)
spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
ret = ath10k_htt_rx_ring_fill_n(htt, (htt->rx_ring.fill_level -
htt->rx_ring.fill_cnt));
- spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
if (ret)
ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free(htt);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -282,7 +283,9 @@ void ath10k_htt_rx_free(struct ath10k_htt *htt)
skb_queue_purge(&htt->rx_in_ord_compl_q);
skb_queue_purge(&htt->tx_fetch_ind_q);
+ spin_lock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free(htt);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&htt->rx_ring.lock);
dma_free_coherent(htt->ar->dev,
htt->rx_ops->htt_get_rx_ring_size(htt),
--
2.4.11
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: ath10k: Protect ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free with rx_ring.lock
2018-06-07 16:11 [PATCH] ath10k: Protect ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free with rx_ring.lock greearb
@ 2018-06-14 9:12 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2018-06-14 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Greear; +Cc: ath10k, linux-wireless, Ben Greear
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>
> While debugging driver crashes related to a buggy firmware
> crashing under load, I noticed that ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free
> could be called without being under lock. I'm not sure if this
> is the root cause of the crash or not, but it seems prudent to
> protect it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Failed to apply, please use ath.git master branch as the baseline. Also
document the tested hardware and firmware versions in the commit log.
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/submittingpatches
error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c:282
error: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c: patch does not apply
stg import: Diff does not apply cleanly
Patch set to Changes Requested.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10453105/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-14 9:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-07 16:11 [PATCH] ath10k: Protect ath10k_htt_rx_ring_free with rx_ring.lock greearb
2018-06-14 9:12 ` Kalle Valo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).