linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Grzegorz Duszy??ski <gfduszynski@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: remove division by size of sizeof(struct ieee80211_wmm_rule)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 12:27:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180820102710.GA2760@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180820073705.9683-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 09:37:05AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> 
> Pointer arithmetic already adjusts by the size of the struct,
> so the sizeof() calculation is wrong. This is basically the
> same as Colin King's patch for similar code in the iwlwifi
> driver.
> 
> Fixes: 230ebaa189af ("cfg80211: read wmm rules from regulatory database")
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> ---
>  net/wireless/reg.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c
> index 4fc66a117b7d..283902974fbf 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/reg.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c
> @@ -452,8 +452,7 @@ reg_copy_regd(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *src_regd)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		regd->reg_rules[i].wmm_rule = d_wmm +
> -			(src_regd->reg_rules[i].wmm_rule - s_wmm) /
> -			sizeof(struct ieee80211_wmm_rule);
> +			(src_regd->reg_rules[i].wmm_rule - s_wmm);
>  	}
>  	return regd;
>  }

As side note those pointer aritmetics related with rule->wmm_rule is
really involuted in various places in reg.c . Seems would be better to
just make wmm_rule part of iee80211_reg_rule structure like this:

struct ieee80211_reg_rule {
        struct ieee80211_freq_range freq_range;
        struct ieee80211_power_rule power_rule;
        struct ieee80211_wmm_rule wmm_rule;
        u32 flags;
        u32 dfs_cac_ms;
};

and use a flag to intdicate wmm_rule is valid. There should be no
big memory overhead sice there are only few reg_rules for the regdomain.
Or I'm wrong?

Regards
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-20 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-20  7:37 [PATCH] cfg80211: remove division by size of sizeof(struct ieee80211_wmm_rule) Johannes Berg
2018-08-20 10:27 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2018-08-21  6:23   ` Grzegorz Duszyński
2018-08-21  7:42     ` Grzegorz Duszyński
2018-08-21  9:03     ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-21  9:06       ` Grzegorz Duszyński
2018-08-21  9:07         ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-21  9:11           ` Grzegorz Duszyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180820102710.GA2760@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=gfduszynski@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).