From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc()
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:59:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181004075914.GB20523@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181003140745.7650-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:07:45PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> These possible races are detected by a runtime testing.
> To fix these races, the mutex lock is used in il4965_send_rxon_assoc()
> to protect the data.
Really ? I'm surprised by that, see below.
> @@ -1297,6 +1297,7 @@ il4965_send_rxon_assoc(struct il_priv *il)
> const struct il_rxon_cmd *rxon1 = &il->staging;
> const struct il_rxon_cmd *rxon2 = &il->active;
>
> + mutex_lock(&il->mutex);
> if (rxon1->flags == rxon2->flags &&
For 4965 driver il4965_send_rxon_assoc() is only called by
il_mac_bss_info_changed() and il4965_commit_rxon().
il_mac_bss_info_changed() acquire il->mutex and
callers of il4965_commit_rxon() acquire il->mutex
(but I did not check all of them).
So I wonder how this patch did not cause the deadlock ?
Anyway what can be done is adding:
lockdep_assert_held(&il->mutex);
il4965_commit_rxon() to check if we hold the mutex.
Thanks
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-04 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 14:07 [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc() Jia-Ju Bai
2018-10-04 7:59 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2018-10-04 8:52 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-10-05 7:54 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-10-05 13:42 ` Jia-Ju Bai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181004075914.GB20523@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).