From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc()
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:54:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005075403.GC1931@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <988494cb-c121-697e-b502-ea4e7c601f47@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:52:19PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> On 2018/10/4 15:59, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:07:45PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> >>These possible races are detected by a runtime testing.
> >>To fix these races, the mutex lock is used in il4965_send_rxon_assoc()
> >>to protect the data.
> >Really ? I'm surprised by that, see below.
>
> My runtime testing shows that il4965_send_rxon_assoc() and
> il4965_configure_filter() are concurrently executed.
> But after seeing your reply, I need to carefully check whether my
> runtime testing is right, because I think you are right.
> In fact, I only monitored the iwl4965 driver, but did not monitor
> the iwlegacy driver, so I will do the testing again with monitoring
> the lwlegacy driver.
<snip>
> >So I wonder how this patch did not cause the deadlock ?
>
> Oh, sorry, anyway, my patch will cause double locks...
So how those runtime test were performend such you didn't
notice this ?
> >Anyway what can be done is adding:
> >
> >lockdep_assert_held(&il->mutex);
> >
> >il4965_commit_rxon() to check if we hold the mutex.
>
> I agree.
Care to post a patch ?
Thanks
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-05 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 14:07 [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlegacy: Fix possible data races in il4965_send_rxon_assoc() Jia-Ju Bai
2018-10-04 7:59 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2018-10-04 8:52 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-10-05 7:54 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2018-10-05 13:42 ` Jia-Ju Bai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181005075403.GC1931@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).