Re: [RFC 0/5] add XDP support to mt76x2e/mt76x0e drivers

[Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>]

> >> > This series is intended as a playground to start experimenting/developing
> >> > with XDP/eBPF over WiFi and collect ideas/concerns about it.
> >> > Introduce XDP support to mt76x2e/mt76x0e drivers. Currently supported
> >> > actions are:
> >> > - XDP_PASS
> >> > - XDP_ABORTED
> >> > - XDP_DROP
> >> > Introduce ndo_bpf mac80211 callback in order to to load a bpf
> >> > program into low level driver XDP rx hook.
> >> > This series has been tested through a simple bpf program (available here:
> >> > https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/bpf-workspace/tree/master/mt76_xdp_stats)
> >> > used to count frame types received by the device.
> >> > Possible eBPF use cases could be:
> >> > - implement new statistics through bpf maps
> >> > - implement fast packet filtering (e.g in monitor mode)
> >> > - ...
> >
> > Hi Kalle,
> >
> >> 
> >> This is most likely a stupid question, but why do this in the driver and
> >> not in mac80211 so that all drivers could benefit from it? I guess there
> >> are reasons for that, I just can't figure that out.
> 
> XDP achieves its speedup by running the eBPF program inside the driver
> NAPI loop, before the kernel even touches the data in any other capacity
> (and in particular, before it allocates an SKB). Which kinda means the
> hook needs to be in the driver... Could be a fallback in mac80211,
> though; although we'd have to figure out how that interacts with Generic
> XDP.
> 
> > This is an early stage implementation, at this point I would collect
> > other people opinions/concerns about using bpf/xdp directly on 802.11
> > frames.
> 
> Thanks for looking into this!

Hi Toke,

> 
> I have two concerns with running XDP on 802.11 frames:
> 
> 1. It makes it more difficult to add other XDP actions (such as
>    REDIRECT), as the XDP program would then have to make sure that the
>    outer packet headers are removed before, say, redirecting the packet
>    out of an ethernet interface. Also, if we do add redirect, we would
>    be bypassing mac80211 entirely; to what extent would that mess up
>    internal state?
> 

You are right, my assumption here is the logic/complexity is moved to the bpf
program that needs to take care of all possible issues that can be introduced.
More or less it is the same if a bpf program mess up with TCP segments on a
wired connection, isn't it?

> 2. UI consistency; suddenly, the user needs to know which kind of
>    frames to expect, and XDP program reuse becomes more difficult. This
>    may be unavoidable given the nature of XDP, but some thought needs to
>    go into this. Especially since we wouldn't necessarily be consistent
>    between WiFi drivers (there are fullmac devices that remove 802.11
>    headers before sending up the frame, right?).
> 

Right, maybe can we have some kind of 'wifi' bpf helpers?

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> Adding in Jesper; maybe he has some thoughts on this?
> 
> -Toke