From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Ricardo Salveti <rsalveti@rsalveti.net>
Cc: eyalr@ti.com, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, anders.roxell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: wlcore getting stuck on hikey after the runtime PM autosuspend support change
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:28:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214232857.GZ39861@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHYQr0qg31hqyzm9uK03qz=DmUkA9idqTrhLaP9A6nuXPEW73w@mail.gmail.com>
* Ricardo Salveti <rsalveti@rsalveti.net> [181214 12:42]:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:45 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Ricardo Salveti <rsalveti@rsalveti.net> [181213 13:53]:
> > > I tried just increasing WL1271_PRE_POWER_ON_SLEEP from 20ms to 50ms
> > > (which gets used before calling wl12xx_sdio_power_on), and that was
> > > already enough to fix my issues on both hikey and beaglebone black
> > > wireless.
> >
> > OK good to hear that helps :)
> >
> > > Should we define another pre power on sleep specifically for the sdio
> > > case (and use directly in wl12xx_sdio_power_on)?
> >
> > I'd probably prefer to just increase WL1271_PRE_POWER_ON_SLEEP,
> > chances are the same delay is needed in all cases.
>
> Investigating this issue a bit more, I noticed that the hang happens
> when PM decides to not suspend the device when doing an if down/up
> cycle.
>
> Basically since commit 60f36637bbbd ("wlcore: sdio: allow pm to handle
> sdio power") PM is now handling the sdio power off/on process, and if
> wl12xx_sdio_power_on gets called right after wl12xx_sdio_power_off (if
> down/up), the device will not go to the required power off/on sequence
> (since PM will abort the suspend process), and the firmware loading
> process will fail. I would guess the problem only happens with
> autosuspend because of the extra delay it causes (pm_runtime_put
> always returns -EBUSY on wl12xx_sdio_power_off with autosuspend).
OK thanks for the update, that's interesting.
> Is there a way to force the suspend on wl12xx_sdio_power_off, or
> should we partially restore the old behavior?
Well usually we could do pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() but
here it won't help as the pm_runtime_put() is already in
progress by the SDIO subsystem and that's why we get -EBUSY.
Does adding a little wait at the end of wl12xx_sdio_power_off()
before return? Maybe something like:
/* Make sure the card gets powered off */
while (error == -EBUSY && !pm_runtime_suspended(&card->dev) &&
retries--) {
msleep(100);
}
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-14 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 18:06 wlcore getting stuck on hikey after the runtime PM autosuspend support change Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-11 18:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-11 18:52 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-11 19:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-11 19:25 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-11 19:50 ` John Stultz
2018-12-11 20:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-11 20:23 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-11 20:44 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-12 1:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-12 7:27 ` [EXTERNAL] " Reizer, Eyal
2018-12-12 18:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-12 19:24 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-13 7:49 ` Reizer, Eyal
2018-12-13 13:52 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-13 14:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-13 14:53 ` Reizer, Eyal
2018-12-13 14:55 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-14 20:41 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-14 23:28 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2018-12-15 3:37 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-17 14:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-12 19:16 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-11 21:50 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-11 23:44 ` Anders Roxell
2018-12-12 18:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-17 9:36 ` Anders Roxell
2018-12-12 1:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-12-12 19:20 ` Ricardo Salveti
2018-12-11 19:13 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181214232857.GZ39861@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=eyalr@ti.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rsalveti@rsalveti.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).