From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@synopsys.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] mt76x0u: Probing issues on Raspberry Pi 3 B+
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:04:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211100405.GD3467@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211074455.GA6292@redhat.com>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:22:25AM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:29:05PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > > > could you please test the following series:
> > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10764453/
> > > >
> > > > yeah this fixed the probing timeout and the driver will probe successful. AFAIK the dwc2 host mode doesn't support scatter-gather yet.
> > >
> > > So this is either dwc2 scatter-gather problem which should be addressed in
> > > this driver or mt76x0u does something wrong when configuring SG.
> > >
> > > Disabling SG is just workaround, which do not address actual problem.
> > >
> > > I think I found mt76x0u issue that could cause this USB probe error
> > > (and possibly also address AMD IOMMU issue). We seems do not correctly
> > > set URB transfer length smaller than sg buffer length. Attached patch
> > > should correct that.
> >
> > Hi Stanislaw,
> >
> > I think 'sg[0].length' is already set in mt76u_fill_rx_sg().
>
> It is, buf->len and sg[0].length are initialized to the same value for 1
> segment. But then buf->len (assigned to urb->buffer_transfer_length) change
> to smaller value , but sg[0].length stay the same. What I think can be
> problem for usb host driver.
>
> > Moreover applying this patch I got the following crash (rpi-5.0.y):
>
> Ok, so with patch probe fail instantly and trigger yet another bug(s)
> on error path. You seems to address that already.
>
> > Moreover for mt76x0u SG is 'already' disabled since we use just one
> > buffer so from performance point of view I do not see any difference
> > of using a standard usb buffer.
> > This patch has been tested in multiple scenarios and seems to fix
> > reported issues (for usb2.0).
>
> Ok, so passing buffer via urb->transfer_buffer works. But why urb->sg
> does not work for 1 segment ?
Here it is a different issue respect to the AMD IOMMU one, dwc2 host driver
does not implement SG I/O so probing fails. I guess it is still useful to
implement a 'legacy' mode that enable mt76 on host controllers that do not implement
SG I/O (rpi is a very common device so it will be cool to have mt76 working on
it). Moreover we are not removing functionalities, user experience will remain
the same
>
> > Are you concerned about increasing code complexity?
>
> That's one of my concerns. Another, more important one, is that
> changing to urb->transfer_buffer just hide the problems. And they will
> pop up when someone will start to use SG (BTW how this can be tested
> for more than one fragment, IOW how multiple fragments skb's can
> be generated ? ).
You need:
- usb 3.0 controller/device
- A-MSDU capable AP
>
> And now I think the bugs can be in mt76 driver taking that problems
> happened on different platforms (rpi and AMD IOMMU), i.e. we do not
> correctly set urb->nub_seg or length or do some other thing wrong.
We still need to fix it on usb3.0 with AMD cpu/motherboard :)
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-09 12:08 [BUG] mt76x0u: Probing issues on Raspberry Pi 3 B+ Stefan Wahren
2019-02-09 18:46 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-09 20:29 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-09 20:33 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-09 22:47 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-10 9:41 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-10 10:22 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11 7:44 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-11 10:04 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2019-02-11 10:33 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 11:06 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11 14:04 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 15:10 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11 15:27 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 15:57 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-13 7:05 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 17:22 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-10 9:29 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-10 16:38 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-10 16:52 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-10 17:39 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-11 7:50 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-11 8:08 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-11 9:52 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
[not found] <20190211173315.GE6292@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1902111246410.1543-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
2019-02-12 0:06 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-12 9:30 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-12 11:58 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-12 13:15 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-14 6:49 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-14 9:25 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-14 9:48 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-14 9:54 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-15 7:12 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-16 11:05 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-16 14:07 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-16 19:17 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-18 13:52 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-18 14:25 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-18 14:47 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-18 14:43 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-18 15:03 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-18 18:52 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-19 10:42 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-19 12:19 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-20 13:00 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 13:22 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-20 16:14 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 16:22 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-02-20 16:32 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 16:36 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-03-03 21:16 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-18 22:19 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-19 10:59 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-19 12:11 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-02-19 15:40 ` Alan Stern
2019-02-20 10:20 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-02-20 15:25 ` Alan Stern
2019-02-19 17:02 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-02-12 15:27 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211100405.GD3467@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=hminas@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).