From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 049/187] mt76: fix a leaked reference by adding a missing of_node_put
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:46:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404084605.380921548@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190404084603.119654039@linuxfoundation.org>
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 34e022d8b780a03902d82fb3997ba7c7b1f40c81 ]
The call to of_find_node_by_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
usage.
Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
./drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c:58:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 48, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c:61:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 48, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c:67:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 48, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c:70:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 48, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c:72:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 48, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c
index 530e5593765c..a1529920d877 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/eeprom.c
@@ -54,22 +54,30 @@ mt76_get_of_eeprom(struct mt76_dev *dev, int len)
part = np->name;
mtd = get_mtd_device_nm(part);
- if (IS_ERR(mtd))
- return PTR_ERR(mtd);
+ if (IS_ERR(mtd)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(mtd);
+ goto out_put_node;
+ }
- if (size <= sizeof(*list))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (size <= sizeof(*list)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_put_node;
+ }
offset = be32_to_cpup(list);
ret = mtd_read(mtd, offset, len, &retlen, dev->eeprom.data);
put_mtd_device(mtd);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ goto out_put_node;
- if (retlen < len)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (retlen < len) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_put_node;
+ }
- return 0;
+out_put_node:
+ of_node_put(np);
+ return ret;
#else
return -ENOENT;
#endif
--
2.19.1
parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-04 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20190404084603.119654039@linuxfoundation.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190404084605.380921548@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).