From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nl80211: require and validate vendor command policy
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 10:12:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190528081239.22495-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Require that each vendor command give a policy of its sub-attributes
in NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA, and then (stricly) check the contents,
including the NLA_F_NESTED flag that we couldn't check on the outer
layer because there we don't know yet.
It is possible to use VENDOR_CMD_RAW_DATA for raw data, but then no
nested data can be given (NLA_F_NESTED flag must be clear) and the
data is just passed as is to the command.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
include/net/cfg80211.h | 8 ++++++++
include/net/netlink.h | 9 +++++++++
net/wireless/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index 948139690a58..56dd141d8c89 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -4152,6 +4152,8 @@ struct sta_opmode_info {
u8 rx_nss;
};
+#define VENDOR_CMD_RAW_DATA ((const struct nla_policy *)ERR_PTR(-ENODATA))
+
/**
* struct wiphy_vendor_command - vendor command definition
* @info: vendor command identifying information, as used in nl80211
@@ -4162,6 +4164,10 @@ struct sta_opmode_info {
* @dumpit: dump callback, for transferring bigger/multiple items. The
* @storage points to cb->args[5], ie. is preserved over the multiple
* dumpit calls.
+ * @policy: policy pointer for attributes within %NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA.
+ * Set this to %VENDOR_CMD_RAW_DATA if no policy can be given and the
+ * attribute is just raw data (e.g. a firmware command).
+ * @maxattr: highest attribute number in policy
* It's recommended to not have the same sub command with both @doit and
* @dumpit, so that userspace can assume certain ones are get and others
* are used with dump requests.
@@ -4174,6 +4180,8 @@ struct wiphy_vendor_command {
int (*dumpit)(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev,
struct sk_buff *skb, const void *data, int data_len,
unsigned long *storage);
+ const struct nla_policy *policy;
+ unsigned int maxattr;
};
/**
diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
index 395b4406f4b0..28ece67f5312 100644
--- a/include/net/netlink.h
+++ b/include/net/netlink.h
@@ -1754,6 +1754,15 @@ static inline int __nla_validate_nested(const struct nlattr *start, int maxtype,
validate, extack);
}
+static inline int
+nl80211_validate_nested(const struct nlattr *start, int maxtype,
+ const struct nla_policy *policy,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ return __nla_validate_nested(start, maxtype, policy,
+ NL_VALIDATE_STRICT, extack);
+}
+
static inline int
nla_validate_nested_deprecated(const struct nlattr *start, int maxtype,
const struct nla_policy *policy,
diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c
index 4e83892f1ac2..305290a109c0 100644
--- a/net/wireless/core.c
+++ b/net/wireless/core.c
@@ -858,6 +858,19 @@ int wiphy_register(struct wiphy *wiphy)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ for (i = 0; i < rdev->wiphy.n_vendor_commands; i++) {
+ /*
+ * Validate we have a policy (can be explicitly set to
+ * VENDOR_CMD_RAW_DATA which is non-NULL) and also that
+ * we have at least one of doit/dumpit.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON(!rdev->wiphy.vendor_commands[i].policy))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (WARN_ON(!rdev->wiphy.vendor_commands[i].doit &&
+ !rdev->wiphy.vendor_commands[i].dumpit))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
if (WARN_ON(rdev->wiphy.wowlan && rdev->wiphy.wowlan->n_patterns &&
(!rdev->wiphy.wowlan->pattern_min_len ||
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 140d24e5718f..70eb841a56c4 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -12623,6 +12623,29 @@ static int nl80211_crit_protocol_stop(struct sk_buff *skb,
return 0;
}
+static int nl80211_vendor_check_policy(const struct wiphy_vendor_command *vcmd,
+ struct nlattr *attr,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ if (vcmd->policy == VENDOR_CMD_RAW_DATA) {
+ if (attr->nla_type & NLA_F_NESTED) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr,
+ "unexpected nested data");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!(attr->nla_type & NLA_F_NESTED)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr, "expected nested data");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return nl80211_validate_nested(attr, vcmd->maxattr, vcmd->policy,
+ extack);
+}
+
static int nl80211_vendor_cmd(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = info->user_ptr[0];
@@ -12681,11 +12704,16 @@ static int nl80211_vendor_cmd(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA]) {
data = nla_data(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA]);
len = nla_len(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA]);
+
+ err = nl80211_vendor_check_policy(vcmd,
+ info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA],
+ info->extack);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
}
rdev->cur_cmd_info = info;
- err = rdev->wiphy.vendor_commands[i].doit(&rdev->wiphy, wdev,
- data, len);
+ err = vcmd->doit(&rdev->wiphy, wdev, data, len);
rdev->cur_cmd_info = NULL;
return err;
}
@@ -12772,6 +12800,13 @@ static int nl80211_prepare_vendor_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (attrbuf[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA]) {
data = nla_data(attrbuf[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA]);
data_len = nla_len(attrbuf[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA]);
+
+ err = nl80211_vendor_check_policy(
+ &(*rdev)->wiphy.vendor_commands[vcmd_idx],
+ attrbuf[NL80211_ATTR_VENDOR_DATA],
+ cb->extack);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
}
/* 0 is the first index - add 1 to parse only once */
--
2.17.2
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-28 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-28 8:12 Johannes Berg [this message]
2019-05-31 8:00 ` [nl80211] 52f9c100b1: WARNING:at_net/wireless/core.c:#wiphy_register kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190528081239.22495-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox