From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD4DC28CC5 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 07:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B055B208E3 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 07:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727138AbfFHHXu (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jun 2019 03:23:50 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:60411 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726667AbfFHHXu (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jun 2019 03:23:50 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 7E63E68B02; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 09:23:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 09:23:22 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Larry Finger , Aaro Koskinen , Christoph Hellwig , Christian Zigotzky , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] b43legacy broken on G4 PowerBook Message-ID: <20190608072322.GA18896@lst.de> References: <20190605225059.GA9953@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <73da300c-871c-77ac-8a3a-deac226743ef@lwfinger.net> <7697a9d10777b28ae79fdffdde6d0985555f6310.camel@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7697a9d10777b28ae79fdffdde6d0985555f6310.camel@kernel.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:21:23PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Please try the attached patch. I'm not really pleased with it and I will > > continue to determine why the fallback to a 30-bit mask fails, but at least this > > one works for me. > > Your patch only makes sense if the device is indeed capable of > addressing 31-bits. > > So either the driver is buggy and asks for a too small mask in which > case your patch is ok, or it's not and you're just going to cause all > sort of interesting random problems including possible memory > corruption. Well, my patches changes ZONE_DMA to be 30-bits instead of 31, and thus should allow requesting a 30-bit mask to succeed.