From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE60C4321A for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 07:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2189B208E3 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 07:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404509AbfFKHy1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:54:27 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48933 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2403815AbfFKHy0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:54:26 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 92C8268B02; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:53:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:53:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Larry Finger , Aaro Koskinen , Christian Zigotzky , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] b43legacy broken on G4 PowerBook Message-ID: <20190611075358.GA21815@lst.de> References: <20190605225059.GA9953@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> <73da300c-871c-77ac-8a3a-deac226743ef@lwfinger.net> <7697a9d10777b28ae79fdffdde6d0985555f6310.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <3ed1ccfe-d7ca-11b9-17b3-303d1ae1bb0f@lwfinger.net> <20190611060816.GA20158@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:58:12PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > ... which b43legacy doesn't set to the best of my knowledge ... > > Which makes me wonder how come it didn't work even with your patches ? > AFAIK, we have less than 1GB of lowmem unless the config has been > tweaked.... It needs to bounce to somewhere. And the dma-direct code is pretty strict to require a zone it can do allocations from when setting the dma mask. As was the old ppc64 code, but not the ppc32 code that allowed setting any DMA mask. And something about the more strict validation seem to trip up now.