linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
	Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] iwlwifi: dvm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:26:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190612142658.12792-3-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612142658.12792-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
return value.  This driver was saving the debugfs file away to be
removed at a later time.  However, the 80211 core would delete the whole
directory that the debugfs files are created in, after it asks the
driver to do the deletion, so just rely on the 80211 core to do all of
the cleanup for us, making us not need to keep a pointer to the dentries
around at all.

This cleans up the structure of the driver data a bit and makes the code
a tiny bit smaller.

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c | 29 ++++++---------------
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.h |  4 ---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
index ef4b9de256f7..91e571c99f81 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
@@ -3271,28 +3271,16 @@ static void rs_add_debugfs(void *priv, void *priv_sta,
 					struct dentry *dir)
 {
 	struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta = priv_sta;
-	lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_scale_table_file =
-		debugfs_create_file("rate_scale_table", 0600, dir,
-				    lq_sta, &rs_sta_dbgfs_scale_table_ops);
-	lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_stats_table_file =
-		debugfs_create_file("rate_stats_table", 0400, dir,
-				    lq_sta, &rs_sta_dbgfs_stats_table_ops);
-	lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_rate_scale_data_file =
-		debugfs_create_file("rate_scale_data", 0400, dir,
-				    lq_sta, &rs_sta_dbgfs_rate_scale_data_ops);
-	lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_tx_agg_tid_en_file =
-		debugfs_create_u8("tx_agg_tid_enable", 0600, dir,
-				  &lq_sta->tx_agg_tid_en);
 
-}
+	debugfs_create_file("rate_scale_table", 0600, dir, lq_sta,
+			    &rs_sta_dbgfs_scale_table_ops);
+	debugfs_create_file("rate_stats_table", 0400, dir, lq_sta,
+			    &rs_sta_dbgfs_stats_table_ops);
+	debugfs_create_file("rate_scale_data", 0400, dir, lq_sta,
+			    &rs_sta_dbgfs_rate_scale_data_ops);
+	debugfs_create_u8("tx_agg_tid_enable", 0600, dir,
+			  &lq_sta->tx_agg_tid_en);
 
-static void rs_remove_debugfs(void *priv, void *priv_sta)
-{
-	struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta = priv_sta;
-	debugfs_remove(lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_scale_table_file);
-	debugfs_remove(lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_stats_table_file);
-	debugfs_remove(lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_rate_scale_data_file);
-	debugfs_remove(lq_sta->rs_sta_dbgfs_tx_agg_tid_en_file);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -3318,7 +3306,6 @@ static const struct rate_control_ops rs_ops = {
 	.free_sta = rs_free_sta,
 #ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS
 	.add_sta_debugfs = rs_add_debugfs,
-	.remove_sta_debugfs = rs_remove_debugfs,
 #endif
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.h b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.h
index b2df3a8cc464..92836a815234 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.h
@@ -367,10 +367,6 @@ struct iwl_lq_sta {
 	struct iwl_traffic_load load[IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT];
 	u8 tx_agg_tid_en;
 #ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS
-	struct dentry *rs_sta_dbgfs_scale_table_file;
-	struct dentry *rs_sta_dbgfs_stats_table_file;
-	struct dentry *rs_sta_dbgfs_rate_scale_data_file;
-	struct dentry *rs_sta_dbgfs_tx_agg_tid_en_file;
 	u32 dbg_fixed_rate;
 #endif
 	struct iwl_priv *drv;
-- 
2.22.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-12 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-12 14:26 [PATCH 1/5] iwlegacy: 3945: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-12 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] iwlegacy: 4965: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-12 14:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-07-05  8:37   ` [PATCH 3/5] iwlwifi: dvm: " Luciano Coelho
2019-06-12 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] iwlwifi: mvm: remove unused .remove_sta_debugfs callback Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-07-05  8:38   ` Luciano Coelho
2019-06-12 14:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] mac80211: remove unused and unneeded remove_sta_debugfs callback Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-25  5:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] iwlegacy: 3945: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190612142658.12792-3-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).