From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.3] mt76: mt76x0e: don't use hw encryption for MT7630E
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:09:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815100936.GA21775@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0CqmXM4NRMYU6Lt_a4f+DXE2bVmhYrjQbgxHG0g=N+o3TeQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:50:12AM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >
> > Since 41634aa8d6db ("mt76: only schedule txqs from the tx tasklet")
> > I can observe firmware hangs on MT7630E on station mode: tx stop
> > functioning after minor activity (rx keep working) and on module
> > unload device fail to stop with messages:
> >
> > [ 5446.141413] mt76x0e 0000:06:00.0: TX DMA did not stop
> > [ 5449.176764] mt76x0e 0000:06:00.0: TX DMA did not stop
> >
> > Loading module again results in failure to associate with AP.
> > Only machine power off / power on cycle can make device work again.
> >
> > It's unclear why commit 41634aa8d6db causes the problem, but it is
> > related to HW encryption. Since issue is a firmware hang, that is super
> > hard to debug, just disable HW encryption as fix for the issue.
> >
> > Fixes: 41634aa8d6db ("mt76: only schedule txqs from the tx tasklet")
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/pci.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/pci.c
> > index 4585e1b756c2..6117e6ca08cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/pci.c
> > @@ -62,6 +62,19 @@ static void mt76x0e_stop(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> > mt76x0e_stop_hw(dev);
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +mt76x0e_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
> > + struct ieee80211_vif *vif, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
> > + struct ieee80211_key_conf *key)
> > +{
> > + struct mt76x02_dev *dev = hw->priv;
> > +
> > + if (is_mt7630(dev))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> Hi Stanislaw,
>
> Can you please try if disabling/enabling the tx tasklet during hw key
> configuration fixes the issue?
> Doing something like:
>
> tasklet_disable(tx_tasklet)
> mt76x02_set_key()
> tasklet_enable(tx_tasklet)
It does not help with the problem.
> Moreover, have you double checked if there is any performance impact
> of not using hw encryption?
I didn't observe any, but realized on this machine I have
aesni_intel encryption accelerator. After rebuild kernel without
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL, 'perf top' showed extra 20% of cpu usage
in aes_encrypt() when sending data with HW encryption disabled.
> If so, I guess it is better to just redefine mt76_wake_tx_queue for
> mt76x0e and run mt76_txq_schedule for 7630e:
>
> void mt76x0e_wake_tx_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_txq *txq)
> {
> if (is_mt7630(dev)) {
> mt76_txq_schedule(dev, txq->ac);
> } else {
> tasklet_schedule(&dev->tx_tasklet);
> }
> }
Not sure about reduction of lock contention for which the tx_tasklet
was introduced here, but looks ok for me as fix.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-15 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 13:36 [PATCH 5.3] mt76: mt76x0e: don't use hw encryption for MT7630E Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-08-14 9:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-08-15 10:09 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2019-08-15 10:20 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-08-19 11:06 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-08-20 10:31 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-08-20 11:24 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-08-21 8:47 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-08-21 9:03 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-08-21 10:40 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-08-21 11:22 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2019-08-22 7:23 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-09-03 13:49 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190815100936.GA21775@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=royluo@google.com \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).