linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <yhchuang@realtek.com>
To: <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/12] rtw88: leave PS state for dynamic mechanism
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:31:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191002023128.12090-8-yhchuang@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002023128.12090-1-yhchuang@realtek.com>

From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>

Dynamic mechanism requires BB/RF working to adjust
hardware settings. But PS state periodically turns
off BB/RF, could lead to wrong setting.

So leave PS state before DM to make sure it works.
And then check if we can enter PS state again.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
---

v1 -> v2
  - rebase on top of wireless-drivers-next

 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
index f55eda9da827..00ebf8cc81b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
@@ -174,6 +174,14 @@ static void rtw_watch_dog_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	rtwdev->stats.tx_cnt = 0;
 	rtwdev->stats.rx_cnt = 0;
 
+	if (test_bit(RTW_FLAG_SCANNING, rtwdev->flags))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	/* make sure BB/RF is working for dynamic mech */
+	rtw_leave_lps(rtwdev);
+
+	rtw_phy_dynamic_mechanism(rtwdev);
+
 	/* use atomic version to avoid taking local->iflist_mtx mutex */
 	rtw_iterate_vifs_atomic(rtwdev, rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter, &data);
 
@@ -184,13 +192,6 @@ static void rtw_watch_dog_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (rtw_fw_support_lps &&
 	    data.rtwvif && !data.active && data.assoc_cnt == 1)
 		rtw_enter_lps(rtwdev, data.rtwvif->port);
-	else
-		rtw_leave_lps(rtwdev);
-
-	if (test_bit(RTW_FLAG_SCANNING, rtwdev->flags))
-		goto unlock;
-
-	rtw_phy_dynamic_mechanism(rtwdev);
 
 	rtwdev->watch_dog_cnt++;
 
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-02  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02  2:31 [PATCH v2 00/12] rtw88: Add support for deep PS mode yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] rtw88: remove redundant flag check helper function yhchuang
2019-10-02  4:34   ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] rtw88: pci: reset H2C queue indexes in a single write yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] rtw88: not to enter or leave PS under IRQ yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] rtw88: not to control LPS by each vif yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] rtw88: remove unused lps state check helper yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] rtw88: LPS enter/leave should be protected by lock yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` yhchuang [this message]
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] rtw88: add deep power save support yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] rtw88: not to enter LPS by coex strategy yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] rtw88: select deep PS mode when module is inserted yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] rtw88: add deep PS PG mode for 8822c yhchuang
2019-10-02  2:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] rtw88: remove misleading module parameter rtw_fw_support_lps yhchuang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191002023128.12090-8-yhchuang@realtek.com \
    --to=yhchuang@realtek.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).