From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C3FC432C0 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3362122419 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:37:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574249856; bh=nbHC84ZDlcC/R2zoZ1BzeanN0qdpNKuurPfBIeJxVe0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=qG9pFTiYeEBfhdiFwuwzx5b0t4MZ8L90LbDcZNyZmm6P8aQW/R7k8Qd6k3Zud7YE4 ViCc/hJhM7YpAhdBFgLhImkYHl5M9eLcGbY/Lwrj/UI/cpCdIZU9iZdN2SokRPJ8bl 8u5DFBlCiahL3Gc8bDcafH3/TH+LlsJwpHkBG0xQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729253AbfKTLhf (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:37:35 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34420 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727586AbfKTLhf (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:37:35 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [77.139.212.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2669F20857; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:37:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574249854; bh=nbHC84ZDlcC/R2zoZ1BzeanN0qdpNKuurPfBIeJxVe0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=z8fAdhUztMh3H/kPU7MdO0oz1cs670cIh/IfIbM6+WTZzSMpUn32YTqNQI7bGOc9N fLzgpeV1fF4FY0oOc1qOYsL8wb0oJxoRmMSJrjfBlX4tttL0SJktNwWKhhy/Hpqrye GXkt/1iemq0US8z/7sT2BY6EJEOQlb9VGjHSbIl8= Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 13:37:23 +0200 From: Lorenzo Bianconi To: Felix Fietkau Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, royluo@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mt76: mt76x02: fix coverage_class type Message-ID: <20191120113723.GA21993@localhost.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On 2019-11-15 16:05, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > Fix coverage_class definition in mt76x02_dev data structure since > > coverage_class can be negative to enable dynack (just supported by > > ath9k) > >=20 > > Fixes: 7bc04215a66b ("mt76: add driver code for MT76x2e") > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi > I'd prefer a patch that sets the internal coverage_class field value to > 0 for negative input values. ack, I will do in v2 Regards, Lorenzo >=20 > - Felix --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQTquNwa3Txd3rGGn7Y6cBh0uS2trAUCXdUlcAAKCRA6cBh0uS2t rB2xAP4nbrNGoatkv4SAN3Cr1XlHBzNjQtNhs7Slxi9CF5xH4gEAjRzuICHik3Ds V8YiNSNBe54THBUkapBh91jQ39On/AM= =hgRF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--