From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Eyal Reizer <eyalr@ti.com>, Guy Mishol <guym@ti.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] wlcore: Use spin_trylock in wlcore_irq() to see if we need to queue tx
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:29:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200702162951.45392-4-tony@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702162951.45392-1-tony@atomide.com>
We currently have a collection of flags and locking between the
threaded irq and tx work:
- wl->flags bitops
- wl->mutex
- wl->wl_lock spinlock
The bitops flags do not need a spinlock around them, and we only need
the spinlock to see if we need to queue tx work or not. And wlcore_irq()
holds the mutex.
To simplify the locking, we can use spin_trylock and always queue tx
work unless we know there's nothing to do.
Let's also update the comment a bit while at it.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
@@ -652,6 +652,7 @@ static irqreturn_t wlcore_irq(int irq, void *cookie)
int ret;
unsigned long flags;
struct wl1271 *wl = cookie;
+ bool queue_tx_work = true;
set_bit(WL1271_FLAG_IRQ_RUNNING, &wl->flags);
@@ -684,13 +685,17 @@ static irqreturn_t wlcore_irq(int irq, void *cookie)
if (ret)
wl12xx_queue_recovery_work(wl);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
- /* In case TX was not handled here, queue TX work */
+ /* In case TX was not handled in wlcore_irq_locked(), queue TX work */
clear_bit(WL1271_FLAG_TX_PENDING, &wl->flags);
- if (!test_bit(WL1271_FLAG_FW_TX_BUSY, &wl->flags) &&
- wl1271_tx_total_queue_count(wl) > 0)
- ieee80211_queue_work(wl->hw, &wl->tx_work);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
+ if (!test_bit(WL1271_FLAG_FW_TX_BUSY, &wl->flags)) {
+ if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&wl->wl_lock, flags)) {
+ if (!wl1271_tx_total_queue_count(wl))
+ queue_tx_work = false;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
+ }
+ if (queue_tx_work)
+ ieee80211_queue_work(wl->hw, &wl->tx_work);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-02 16:29 [PATCHv2 0/4] Improvments for wlcore irq and resume for v5.9 Tony Lindgren
2020-07-02 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] wlcore: Simplify runtime resume ELP path Tony Lindgren
2020-07-15 9:12 ` Kalle Valo
2020-07-02 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] wlcore: Use spin_trylock in wlcore_irq_locked() for running the queue Tony Lindgren
2020-07-02 16:29 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2020-07-02 16:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] wlcore: Remove pointless spinlock Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200702162951.45392-4-tony@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=eyalr@ti.com \
--cc=guym@ti.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).