From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ath10k: start recovery process when payload length exceeds max htc length for sdio
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:37:36 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200814153736.40ED8C433CA@smtp.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200108031957.22308-3-wgong@codeaurora.org>
Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> When simulate random transfer fail for sdio write and read, it happened
> "payload length exceeds max htc length" and recovery later sometimes.
>
> Test steps:
> 1. Add config and update kernel:
> CONFIG_FAIL_MMC_REQUEST=y
> CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION=y
> CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS=y
>
> 2. Run simulate fail:
> cd /sys/kernel/debug/mmc1/fail_mmc_request
> echo 10 > probability
> echo 10 > times # repeat until hitting issues
>
> 3. It happened payload length exceeds max htc length.
> [ 199.935506] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: payload length 57005 exceeds max htc length: 4088
> ....
> [ 264.990191] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: payload length 57005 exceeds max htc length: 4088
>
> 4. after some time, such as 60 seconds, it start recovery which triggered
> by wmi command timeout for periodic scan.
> [ 269.229232] ieee80211 phy0: Hardware restart was requested
> [ 269.734693] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: device successfully recovered
>
> The simulate fail of sdio is not a real sdio transter fail, it only
> set an error status in mmc_should_fail_request after the transfer end,
> actually the transfer is success, then sdio_io_rw_ext_helper will
> return error status and stop transfer the left data. For example,
> the really RX len is 286 bytes, then it will split to 2 blocks in
> sdio_io_rw_ext_helper, one is 256 bytes, left is 30 bytes, if the
> first 256 bytes get an error status by mmc_should_fail_request,then
> the left 30 bytes will not read in this RX operation. Then when the
> next RX arrive, the left 30 bytes will be considered as the header
> of the read, the top 4 bytes of the 30 bytes will be considered as
> lookaheads, but actually the 4 bytes is not the lookaheads, so the len
> from this lookaheads is not correct, it exceeds max htc length 4088
> sometimes. When happened exceeds, the buffer chain is not matched between
> firmware and ath10k, then it need to start recovery ASAP. Recently then
> recovery will be started by wmi command timeout, but it will be long time
> later, for example, it is 60+ seconds later from the periodic scan, if
> it does not have periodic scan, it will be longer.
>
> Start recovery when it happened "payload length exceeds max htc length"
> will be reasonable.
>
> This patch only effect sdio chips.
>
> Tested with QCA6174 SDIO with firmware WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00029.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
2fd3c8f34d08 ath10k: start recovery process when payload length exceeds max htc length for sdio
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11322583/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-14 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-08 3:19 [PATCH v4 0/2] start recovery process when payload length overflow for sdio Wen Gong
2020-01-08 3:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ath10k: add refcount for ath10k_core_restart Wen Gong
2020-01-08 12:02 ` Justin Capella
2020-01-10 10:29 ` Wen Gong
2020-01-17 7:19 ` Wen Gong
2020-01-20 9:38 ` Justin Capella
2020-01-20 13:34 ` Wen Gong
2020-01-20 15:37 ` Justin Capella
2020-08-14 17:19 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-18 8:39 ` Wen Gong
2020-09-07 15:52 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-19 12:01 ` Wen Gong
2020-08-20 9:18 ` Wen Gong
2020-08-24 4:36 ` Wen Gong
2020-09-07 15:55 ` Kalle Valo
[not found] ` <871rjd37kz.fsf@codeaurora.org>
2020-09-08 3:47 ` Wen Gong
2020-01-08 3:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ath10k: start recovery process when payload length exceeds max htc length for sdio Wen Gong
2020-08-14 15:37 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200814153736.40ED8C433CA@smtp.codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wgong@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).