From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689E3C4346E for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5232923A34 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AEykn3yq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726291AbgI0K6h (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 06:58:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40422 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726185AbgI0K6h (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 06:58:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA831C0613CE; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 03:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id x14so8517511wrl.12; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 03:58:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LKoRLUepQ4VZcCInc1ZWb0QZsddQAw2nMhBfFTWYIEE=; b=AEykn3yqJ8jk8UYWLYjRk02fU7D5TOSfQSL/b9w08iRPTbgBb8+I3qiVzCi5NcUkE1 Ap7pThACS46cqGkgDYZUxwEBi98LCI83xCoS4l6LJjM8Z7jVtb4eOZc2QAzIwHprWd05 TSaFhegBK4/MM+3I5FJ5AQBuLdY9rbUyhOrA94on0BCzFeAQD70nyUYM4zi4W2zXLjlu F/3A0AnbgHVOfrcigk6BxkTQB3F3T2k36GGe5cCj1AdcV1hIribpaL+mhYBucde56aaG nXrydLrs8AAzv0UqL5qoSBw98dHLWVBUXzFheWde3qXSqxraeCltOCGEV962F9r9Vxn5 Tv3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LKoRLUepQ4VZcCInc1ZWb0QZsddQAw2nMhBfFTWYIEE=; b=ukMaqAU6R7fHpMt5ZMkuv9kf7C9p9y+0exwvKvN+LRuwQ9AkfW/DKZtHqX5IMxBmHc WVtpsfYowttXL7+pJ2xbaVjGky9TponADCtHZCuieE+bVoF0E74pQhRMOrYCrIF7+lxG 1svZujswjsko+VoU08PKpfPMIXCtTB41hdsphabMvFJb5YOUj2cniRiSiJNbxTk2noj3 93kdBZjFXvJAJ3Yqjn20aaFHbvINUz6fUmgNaAqgym1QYA7t20YHxYDVUplBBOWfeohk YY3YjdYIXB6mcOhyr+4Tmx4QoCmrPvOtyjmg4fnJuodoEqAQ/cyjvpasM/43Z+tGQrTA J1bQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xjdFc17JiKIqaoBdekap2qMstlLlOx5Gk+PlzVfOIyqFiAQH2 9ALF79Iec09IrO5rlXy+RA6e18A+qr9Q9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiyAsCxfQAz9UD5X1y1A4U9OeyXXCgiHypeRTMLUPNFg0zEnAsGYxQUhLSm0dqIR6XAvfvZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:50c3:: with SMTP id f3mr13370984wrt.125.1601204315374; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 03:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from medion (cpc83661-brig20-2-0-cust443.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.28.105.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l19sm5145950wmi.8.2020.09.27.03.58.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 03:58:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Dewar X-Google-Original-From: Alex Dewar Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 11:58:28 +0100 To: Kalle Valo Cc: Julian Calaby , Alex Dewar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, LKML , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Jakub Kicinski , Saeed Mahameed , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: sdio: remove redundant check in for loop Message-ID: <20200927105828.522fabbpyxx2mt3n@medion> References: <20200916165748.20927-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com> <87h7rnnnrb.fsf@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7rnnnrb.fsf@codeaurora.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > I agree. Anyone can come up with a patch? Hi Kalle, I was thinking of having a go at this. Have you applied the v2 of this patch yet though? I couldn't see it in wireless-drivers-next. I just don't want to have to rebase the patch if you were going to apply this v2. Best, Alex > > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches