From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: Bernie Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>,
"tony0620emma@gmail.com" <tony0620emma@gmail.com>,
"kvalo@kernel.org" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw88: fix use after free in rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req()
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:22:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220203082205.GD1978@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bf144b4f5782c7909f783a0c5deb15e6186f032.camel@realtek.com>
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:59:47AM +0000, Pkshih wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 16:05 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This code needs to use skb_queue_walk_safe() instead of skb_queue_walk()
> > because it frees the list iterator.
> >
> > Fixes: d95984b5580d ("rtw88: fix memory overrun and memory leak during hw_scan")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> > index ce9535cce723..2de0bb67bac6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> > @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ static int rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> > {
> > struct cfg80211_scan_request *req = rtwvif->scan_req;
> > struct sk_buff_head list;
> > - struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb, *tmp;
> > u8 num = req->n_ssids, i, bands = 0;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -1889,7 +1889,7 @@ static int rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> > return _rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req(rtwdev, num * bands, &list);
> >
> > out:
> > - skb_queue_walk(&list, skb)
> > + skb_queue_walk_safe(&list, skb, tmp)
> > kfree_skb(skb);
> >
> > return ret;
>
>
> Oops, when I reivewed the patch "rtw88: fix memory overrun and memory leak during hw_scan",
> I did only focus on pointers of list head, but forget skb is freed that leads use after free.
>
> Could I have related fix with this patch?
>
Yes, thank you for noticing that. For some reason, on my system, Smatch
thinks that probe_req_list is always empty and doesn't warn about that
one because "it's impossible".
I will send a v2 patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 13:05 [PATCH] rtw88: fix use after free in rtw_hw_scan_update_probe_req() Dan Carpenter
2022-02-03 7:59 ` Pkshih
2022-02-03 8:22 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220203082205.GD1978@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phhuang@realtek.com \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=tony0620emma@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).