[PATCH 07/11] rtw89: add UNEXP debug mask to keep monitor messages unexpected to happen frequently

[Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

Some warning messages could bother users. With proper handling, these
situations don't really affect usage, but we still need to keep monitor
these messages. If they happen frequently, we must review driver or
hardware design to clarify.

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.h | 2 ++
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c   | 7 ++++---
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index deb39b0d66c89..c494ad9013078 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static int rtw89_core_rx_process_phy_ppdu(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 					  struct rtw89_rx_phy_ppdu *phy_ppdu)
 {
 	if (RTW89_GET_PHY_STS_LEN(phy_ppdu->buf) << 3 != phy_ppdu->len) {
-		rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "phy ppdu len mismatch\n");
+		rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_UNEXP, "phy ppdu len mismatch\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	rtw89_core_update_phy_ppdu(phy_ppdu);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.h
index 561b04faf703d..6176152dbf6bf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ enum rtw89_debug_mask {
 	RTW89_DBG_BF = BIT(14),
 	RTW89_DBG_HW_SCAN = BIT(15),
 	RTW89_DBG_SAR = BIT(16),
+
+	RTW89_DBG_UNEXP = BIT(31),
 };
 
 enum rtw89_debug_mac_reg_sel {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c
index 25872dfb4da1c..fd5d9bde01085 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c
@@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ static u32 rtw89_pci_rxbd_deliver_skbs(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 
 	if (fs) {
 		if (new) {
-			rtw89_err(rtwdev, "skb should not be ready before first segment start\n");
+			rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_UNEXP,
+				    "skb should not be ready before first segment start\n");
 			goto err_sync_device;
 		}
 		if (desc_info->ready) {
@@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ static u32 rtw89_pci_rxbd_deliver_skbs(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	} else {
 		offset = sizeof(struct rtw89_pci_rxbd_info);
 		if (!new) {
-			rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "no last skb\n");
+			rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_UNEXP, "no last skb\n");
 			goto err_sync_device;
 		}
 	}
@@ -605,7 +606,7 @@ static void rtw89_pci_isr_rxd_unavail(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		hw_idx_next = (hw_idx + 1) % bd_ring->len;
 
 		if (hw_idx_next == host_idx)
-			rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "%d RXD unavailable\n", i);
+			rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_UNEXP, "%d RXD unavailable\n", i);
 
 		rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_TXRX,
 			    "%d RXD unavailable, idx=0x%08x, len=%d\n",
-- 
2.25.1