From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: declare correct BA CAM number
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:07:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220815070703.26965-2-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815070703.26965-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
8852A has 2 BA CAM entries, but 8852C has 8 entries. Add a field to
discriminate their differences.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 14 +++++++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 14 ++++++++------
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index a5880a54812e7..07aa722164203 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -2266,13 +2266,15 @@ void rtw89_core_release_all_bits_map(unsigned long *addr, unsigned int nbits)
bitmap_zero(addr, nbits);
}
-int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
+int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+ struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
{
+ const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry *entry;
u8 idx;
- idx = rtw89_core_acquire_bit_map(rtwsta->ba_cam_map, RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM);
- if (idx == RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM) {
+ idx = rtw89_core_acquire_bit_map(rtwsta->ba_cam_map, chip->bacam_num);
+ if (idx == chip->bacam_num) {
/* allocate a static BA CAM to tid=0, so replace the existing
* one if BA CAM is full. Hardware will process the original tid
* automatically.
@@ -2290,12 +2292,14 @@ int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_id
return 0;
}
-int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
+int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+ struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
{
+ const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry *entry;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < chip->bacam_num; i++) {
if (!test_bit(i, rtwsta->ba_cam_map))
continue;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 7a9d6f5d8a513..38228dbe2a7dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -1915,8 +1915,6 @@ struct rtw89_ra_report {
DECLARE_EWMA(rssi, 10, 16);
-#define RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM 2
-
struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry {
u8 tid;
};
@@ -1924,6 +1922,7 @@ struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry {
#define RTW89_MAX_ADDR_CAM_NUM 128
#define RTW89_MAX_BSSID_CAM_NUM 20
#define RTW89_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM 128
+#define RTW89_MAX_BA_CAM_NUM 8
#define RTW89_SEC_CAM_IN_ADDR_CAM 7
struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry {
@@ -1988,8 +1987,8 @@ struct rtw89_sta {
bool cctl_tx_retry_limit;
u32 data_tx_cnt_lmt:6;
- DECLARE_BITMAP(ba_cam_map, RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM);
- struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry ba_cam_entry[RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM];
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(ba_cam_map, RTW89_MAX_BA_CAM_NUM);
+ struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry ba_cam_entry[RTW89_MAX_BA_CAM_NUM];
};
struct rtw89_efuse {
@@ -2393,6 +2392,7 @@ struct rtw89_chip_info {
u8 acam_num;
u8 bcam_num;
u8 scam_num;
+ u8 bacam_num;
u8 sec_ctrl_efuse_size;
u32 physical_efuse_size;
@@ -3910,8 +3910,10 @@ void rtw89_set_channel(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev);
u8 rtw89_core_acquire_bit_map(unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size);
void rtw89_core_release_bit_map(unsigned long *addr, u8 bit);
void rtw89_core_release_all_bits_map(unsigned long *addr, unsigned int nbits);
-int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
-int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
+int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+ struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
+int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+ struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
void rtw89_vif_type_mapping(struct ieee80211_vif *vif, bool assoc);
int rtw89_chip_info_setup(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev);
bool rtw89_ra_report_to_bitrate(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 rpt_rate, u16 *bitrate);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index 6473015a6b2a1..4d39cf9185378 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -644,8 +644,8 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_ba_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta,
int ret;
ret = valid ?
- rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx) :
- rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx);
+ rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(rtwdev, rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx) :
+ rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(rtwdev, rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx);
if (ret) {
/* it still works even if we don't have static BA CAM, because
* hardware can create dynamic BA CAM automatically.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
index 81bd0c4fe21bc..4a1f7b5e83f6c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
@@ -2125,6 +2125,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852a_chip_info = {
.acam_num = 128,
.bcam_num = 10,
.scam_num = 128,
+ .bacam_num = 2,
.sec_ctrl_efuse_size = 4,
.physical_efuse_size = 1216,
.logical_efuse_size = 1536,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
index b697aef2faf2d..a74b4c550ec1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
@@ -2972,6 +2972,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852c_chip_info = {
.acam_num = 128,
.bcam_num = 20,
.scam_num = 128,
+ .bacam_num = 8,
.sec_ctrl_efuse_size = 4,
.physical_efuse_size = 1216,
.logical_efuse_size = 2048,
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 7:07 [PATCH 0/3] wifi: rtw89: correct BA CAM allocation Ping-Ke Shih
2022-08-15 7:07 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2022-08-15 7:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: initialize and correct BA CAM content Ping-Ke Shih
2022-08-15 7:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] wifi: rtw89: correct BA CAM allocation Ping-Ke Shih
2022-08-15 12:20 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220815070703.26965-2-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox