Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: declare correct BA CAM number
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:07:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220815070703.26965-2-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815070703.26965-1-pkshih@realtek.com>

8852A has 2 BA CAM entries, but 8852C has 8 entries. Add a field to
discriminate their differences.

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c     | 14 +++++++++-----
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h     | 14 ++++++++------
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c       |  4 ++--
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c |  1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c |  1 +
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index a5880a54812e7..07aa722164203 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -2266,13 +2266,15 @@ void rtw89_core_release_all_bits_map(unsigned long *addr, unsigned int nbits)
 	bitmap_zero(addr, nbits);
 }
 
-int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
+int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				    struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
 {
+	const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
 	struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry *entry;
 	u8 idx;
 
-	idx = rtw89_core_acquire_bit_map(rtwsta->ba_cam_map, RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM);
-	if (idx == RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM) {
+	idx = rtw89_core_acquire_bit_map(rtwsta->ba_cam_map, chip->bacam_num);
+	if (idx == chip->bacam_num) {
 		/* allocate a static BA CAM to tid=0, so replace the existing
 		 * one if BA CAM is full. Hardware will process the original tid
 		 * automatically.
@@ -2290,12 +2292,14 @@ int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_id
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
+int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				    struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx)
 {
+	const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
 	struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry *entry;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < chip->bacam_num; i++) {
 		if (!test_bit(i, rtwsta->ba_cam_map))
 			continue;
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 7a9d6f5d8a513..38228dbe2a7dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -1915,8 +1915,6 @@ struct rtw89_ra_report {
 
 DECLARE_EWMA(rssi, 10, 16);
 
-#define RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM 2
-
 struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry {
 	u8 tid;
 };
@@ -1924,6 +1922,7 @@ struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry {
 #define RTW89_MAX_ADDR_CAM_NUM		128
 #define RTW89_MAX_BSSID_CAM_NUM		20
 #define RTW89_MAX_SEC_CAM_NUM		128
+#define RTW89_MAX_BA_CAM_NUM		8
 #define RTW89_SEC_CAM_IN_ADDR_CAM	7
 
 struct rtw89_addr_cam_entry {
@@ -1988,8 +1987,8 @@ struct rtw89_sta {
 	bool cctl_tx_retry_limit;
 	u32 data_tx_cnt_lmt:6;
 
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(ba_cam_map, RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM);
-	struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry ba_cam_entry[RTW89_BA_CAM_NUM];
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(ba_cam_map, RTW89_MAX_BA_CAM_NUM);
+	struct rtw89_ba_cam_entry ba_cam_entry[RTW89_MAX_BA_CAM_NUM];
 };
 
 struct rtw89_efuse {
@@ -2393,6 +2392,7 @@ struct rtw89_chip_info {
 	u8 acam_num;
 	u8 bcam_num;
 	u8 scam_num;
+	u8 bacam_num;
 
 	u8 sec_ctrl_efuse_size;
 	u32 physical_efuse_size;
@@ -3910,8 +3910,10 @@ void rtw89_set_channel(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev);
 u8 rtw89_core_acquire_bit_map(unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size);
 void rtw89_core_release_bit_map(unsigned long *addr, u8 bit);
 void rtw89_core_release_all_bits_map(unsigned long *addr, unsigned int nbits);
-int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
-int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
+int rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				    struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
+int rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+				    struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, u8 tid, u8 *cam_idx);
 void rtw89_vif_type_mapping(struct ieee80211_vif *vif, bool assoc);
 int rtw89_chip_info_setup(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev);
 bool rtw89_ra_report_to_bitrate(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 rpt_rate, u16 *bitrate);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index 6473015a6b2a1..4d39cf9185378 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -644,8 +644,8 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_ba_cam(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta,
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = valid ?
-	      rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx) :
-	      rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx);
+	      rtw89_core_acquire_sta_ba_entry(rtwdev, rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx) :
+	      rtw89_core_release_sta_ba_entry(rtwdev, rtwsta, params->tid, &entry_idx);
 	if (ret) {
 		/* it still works even if we don't have static BA CAM, because
 		 * hardware can create dynamic BA CAM automatically.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
index 81bd0c4fe21bc..4a1f7b5e83f6c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
@@ -2125,6 +2125,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852a_chip_info = {
 	.acam_num		= 128,
 	.bcam_num		= 10,
 	.scam_num		= 128,
+	.bacam_num		= 2,
 	.sec_ctrl_efuse_size	= 4,
 	.physical_efuse_size	= 1216,
 	.logical_efuse_size	= 1536,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
index b697aef2faf2d..a74b4c550ec1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
@@ -2972,6 +2972,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852c_chip_info = {
 	.acam_num		= 128,
 	.bcam_num		= 20,
 	.scam_num		= 128,
+	.bacam_num		= 8,
 	.sec_ctrl_efuse_size	= 4,
 	.physical_efuse_size	= 1216,
 	.logical_efuse_size	= 2048,
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-15  7:07 [PATCH 0/3] wifi: rtw89: correct BA CAM allocation Ping-Ke Shih
2022-08-15  7:07 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2022-08-15  7:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: initialize and correct BA CAM content Ping-Ke Shih
2022-08-15  7:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] wifi: rtw89: correct BA CAM allocation Ping-Ke Shih
2022-08-15 12:20   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220815070703.26965-2-pkshih@realtek.com \
    --to=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox