From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03D8C433FE for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236035AbiK2Pzx (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:55:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51816 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232155AbiK2Pzw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:55:52 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5762E9F9; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 2ATFtYEL030062; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:55:34 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:55:34 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: JunASAKA Cc: rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com, Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com, kvalo@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reply to Bitterblue Smith (was [PATCH] drivers: rewrite and remove a superfluous parameter.) Message-ID: <20221129155534.GC29574@1wt.eu> References: <20221129043442.14717-1-JunASAKA@zzy040330.moe> <20221129152212.382062-1-JunASAKA@zzy040330.moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221129152212.382062-1-JunASAKA@zzy040330.moe> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:22:12PM +0800, JunASAKA wrote: > I think you're right and I am comparing those sorces. But the realtek official driver > is far different from the one in rtl8xxxu module. I think it's difficult for me to do it, but > I am trying my best. Would you please preserve the original subject from the thread of messages you are responding to instead of replacing it with a useless "reply to Bitterblue Smith" which nobody knows what it's about and which doesn't bring anything to the discussion since it's written in your message who you're responding to ? It's the third such message you send to the list, at first I tagged them as spam until I saw some responses. Most readers will likely do the same, and even by doing this the best you're doing is to train anti-spam systems to learn these as valid messages (which they do not look like). Thanks in advance, Willy