From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB2BC77B7A for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 17:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231969AbjEPRtV (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2023 13:49:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38780 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232146AbjEPRsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2023 13:48:52 -0400 Received: from bues.ch (bues.ch [IPv6:2a01:138:9005::1:4]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68A1A257; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bues.ch with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pyymf-000LJS-3V; Tue, 16 May 2023 19:48:24 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 19:47:52 +0200 From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= To: "Arnd Bergmann" Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" , "Kalle Valo" , "David S . Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Jakub Kicinski" , "Paolo Abeni" , "Nathan Chancellor" , "Nick Desaulniers" , "Tom Rix" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, Netdev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: b43: fix incorrect __packed annotation Message-ID: <20230516194752.50ae12db@barney> In-Reply-To: References: <20230516074554.1674536-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20230516191245.4149c51a@barney> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.37; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/LydMZaBgIzo3HKHo7_xf/iA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/LydMZaBgIzo3HKHo7_xf/iA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 16 May 2023 19:45:16 +0200 "Arnd Bergmann" wrote: > Should I resend this as a combined patch for both drivers? I think that would be fine, yes. Thank you for checking. --=20 Michael B=C3=BCsch https://bues.ch/ --Sig_/LydMZaBgIzo3HKHo7_xf/iA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEihRzkKVZOnT2ipsS9TK+HZCNiw4FAmRjwcgACgkQ9TK+HZCN iw5T+g/8DVJ2wyaO2Xg8k2CkNMDjP5bFJVvaUnLUQoYFT22CY2Rlkop53SsVpkgL A7/SxrptKK4vPNgO0QjwN8+Nl8KbL320XH+YEFi+f64uJUBrpAusuVOmK5BZ13Il V5ljNaJCWQyAVuYV7YlHFoe/EfSOZI5Ca/KVGzmJbcjCbt9vs9MiRIG8ClBdCS39 NHCDvWw+o7HzmExK9dfeO2puN9dHW54U6Np7sDQ9CBLrM3PDB6STBiIVSNnDvG1Q b2M9mQEcK382pf53+6IJP6xuXppT94TDihTWTzeAmlRIQyMKAkDA7PgSYxr3T6+m U4vPiCjq9mFZO1Mw8BZbLoVkG0JrX3ffO1LisjKqrLw7y6V4CischbnV4Ye6hTaH dw8Fx2QPIsAIjb3kLgEY3BezcURQbRqLb3GPRdFHAS+pi8QbE9Hg5epbkxqW7iLS ff9VDUXftth7fdv0+bMQ8YUuox5unQno/Dc0xaKXshxE4LpXowMlm1RIl+/CyUJ+ +eG1+cdd/NIt6Qw+ped8XxDOCEDeXfwWTrsjMK0WHMUnzItLKeFBJy6yDW9qj+6Y RikXtPHZkrgJA3+Cfc8HWnuo8WFhIQvawGBjqenbVyI0FnuIFnzpys/ukNe/TiQd g7yDBD5EJtNoyK0ez+/NJHOKt0lmcUKselAFpE7DZisStWWnLRs= =syVX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/LydMZaBgIzo3HKHo7_xf/iA--