From: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>, <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
<Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>, <airlied@gmail.com>, <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
<johannes@sipsolutions.net>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>, <mdaenzer@redhat.com>,
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
<hdegoede@redhat.com>, <jingyuwang_vip@163.com>,
<Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>, <jim.cromie@gmail.com>,
<bellosilicio@gmail.com>, <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
<trix@redhat.com>, <jsg@jsg.id.au>, <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH V5 7/9] drm/amd/pm: add flood detection for wbrf events
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:32:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230630103240.1557100-8-evan.quan@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230630103240.1557100-1-evan.quan@amd.com>
To protect PMFW from being overloaded.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 7 +++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
index 83d428e890df..a4cfaf8a6f59 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -1278,7 +1278,8 @@ static int smu_wbrf_event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,
switch (action) {
case WBRF_CHANGED:
- smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE));
break;
default:
return NOTIFY_DONE;
@@ -1287,6 +1288,21 @@ static int smu_wbrf_event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
+/**
+ * smu_wbrf_delayed_work_handler - callback on delayed work timer expired
+ *
+ * @work: struct work_struct pointer
+ *
+ * Flood is over and driver will consume the latest exclusion ranges.
+ */
+static void smu_wbrf_delayed_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct smu_context *smu =
+ container_of(work, struct smu_context, wbrf_delayed_work.work);
+
+ smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
+}
+
/**
* smu_wbrf_support_check - check wbrf support
*
@@ -1323,6 +1339,9 @@ static int smu_wbrf_init(struct smu_context *smu)
if (!smu->wbrf_supported)
return 0;
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work,
+ smu_wbrf_delayed_work_handler);
+
smu->wbrf_notifier.notifier_call = smu_wbrf_event_handler;
ret = wbrf_register_notifier(&smu->wbrf_notifier);
if (ret)
@@ -1333,11 +1352,10 @@ static int smu_wbrf_init(struct smu_context *smu)
* before our driver loaded. To make sure our driver
* is awared of those exclusion ranges.
*/
- ret = smu_wbrf_handle_exclusion_ranges(smu);
- if (ret)
- dev_err(adev->dev, "Failed to handle wbrf exclusion ranges\n");
+ schedule_delayed_work(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE));
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -1353,6 +1371,8 @@ static void smu_wbrf_fini(struct smu_context *smu)
return;
wbrf_unregister_notifier(&smu->wbrf_notifier);
+
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&smu->wbrf_delayed_work);
}
static int smu_smc_hw_setup(struct smu_context *smu)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
index 5b2343cfc69b..5df28d4a8c30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
@@ -480,6 +480,12 @@ struct stb_context {
#define WORKLOAD_POLICY_MAX 7
+/*
+ * Configure wbrf event handling pace as there can be only one
+ * event processed every SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE ms.
+ */
+#define SMU_WBRF_EVENT_HANDLING_PACE 10
+
struct smu_context
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev;
@@ -579,6 +585,7 @@ struct smu_context
/* data structures for wbrf feature support */
bool wbrf_supported;
struct notifier_block wbrf_notifier;
+ struct delayed_work wbrf_delayed_work;
};
struct i2c_adapter;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-30 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 10:32 [PATCH V5 0/9] Enable Wifi RFI interference mitigation feature support Evan Quan
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations Evan Quan
2023-06-30 13:38 ` Simon Horman
2023-07-04 3:41 ` Quan, Evan
2023-06-30 16:40 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-01 0:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-04 3:25 ` Quan, Evan
2023-07-04 3:40 ` Quan, Evan
2023-07-04 3:53 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-01 0:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-04 3:30 ` Quan, Evan
2023-07-04 13:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-06 2:58 ` Quan, Evan
2023-07-06 3:09 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 2/9] driver core: add ACPI based WBRF mechanism introduced by AMD Evan Quan
2023-07-01 0:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-04 3:24 ` Quan, Evan
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 3/9] cfg80211: expose nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz for wide sharing Evan Quan
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 4/9] wifi: mac80211: Add support for ACPI WBRF Evan Quan
2023-06-30 14:08 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-01 1:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-04 3:12 ` Quan, Evan
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 5/9] drm/amd/pm: update driver_if and ppsmc headers for coming wbrf feature Evan Quan
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 6/9] drm/amd/pm: setup the framework to support Wifi RFI mitigation feature Evan Quan
2023-06-30 10:32 ` Evan Quan [this message]
2023-06-30 14:29 ` [PATCH V5 7/9] drm/amd/pm: add flood detection for wbrf events kernel test robot
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 8/9] drm/amd/pm: enable Wifi RFI mitigation feature support for SMU13.0.0 Evan Quan
2023-06-30 10:32 ` [PATCH V5 9/9] drm/amd/pm: enable Wifi RFI mitigation feature support for SMU13.0.7 Evan Quan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230630103240.1557100-8-evan.quan@amd.com \
--to=evan.quan@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Lijo.Lazar@amd.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bellosilicio@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=jingyuwang_vip@163.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jsg@jsg.id.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mdaenzer@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).