[PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by

[PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by

[Kees Cook]

Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for
array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
functions).

As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct
rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.

Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci [1]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 4ba8b3df70ae..d66a1152c3f5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {
 struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {
 	u8 fver;
 	u8 tbl_num;
-	u8 buf[];
+	u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num);
 } __packed;
 
 struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg {
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

On 10/6/23 22:17, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for
> array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
> 
> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct
> rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.
> 
> Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci [1]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Thanks!
-- 
Gustavo

> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> index 4ba8b3df70ae..d66a1152c3f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {
>   struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {
>   	u8 fver;
>   	u8 tbl_num;
> -	u8 buf[];
> +	u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num);
>   } __packed;
>   
>   struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg {

Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by

[Ping-Ke Shih]

On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 13:17 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for
> array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
> 
> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct
> rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.
> 
> Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci [1]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> index 4ba8b3df70ae..d66a1152c3f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {
>  struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {
>         u8 fver;
>         u8 tbl_num;
> -       u8 buf[];
> +       u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num);

This struct isn't defined properly. It should be 

struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {
	u8 fver;
	u8 tbl_num;
	struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot tbl[] __counted_by(tbl_num);
} __packed;

And, we should modify rtw89_btc_fw_set_slots() as well. 

Another struct 'rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg' has similar problem.

So, NACK this patch. I will prepare one or two patches for them next week. 

By the way, I have question about __counted_by(). Can I apply it to little/big-
endian 'num'? Like

struct foo {
	...
	__le32 num;
	__le32 data[] __counted_by(num);
}


>  } __packed;
> 
>  struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg {
> --
> 2.34.1
> 

Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by

[Kees Cook]

On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 01:20:43AM +0000, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 13:17 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > 
> > Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> > attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> > their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for
> > array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> > functions).
> > 
> > As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct
> > rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table.
> > 
> > Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
> > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> > Link: https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> > index 4ba8b3df70ae..d66a1152c3f5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> > @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_report {
> >  struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {
> >         u8 fver;
> >         u8 tbl_num;
> > -       u8 buf[];
> > +       u8 buf[] __counted_by(tbl_num);
> 
> This struct isn't defined properly. It should be 
> 
> struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table {
> 	u8 fver;
> 	u8 tbl_num;
> 	struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot tbl[] __counted_by(tbl_num);
> } __packed;
> 
> And, we should modify rtw89_btc_fw_set_slots() as well. 
> 
> Another struct 'rtw89_btc_btf_set_mon_reg' has similar problem.
> 
> So, NACK this patch. I will prepare one or two patches for them next week. 

Ah-ha; thank you!

> By the way, I have question about __counted_by(). Can I apply it to little/big-
> endian 'num'? Like
> 
> struct foo {
> 	...
> 	__le32 num;
> 	__le32 data[] __counted_by(num);
> }

Unfortunately not yet. I hope to see it extended in the future to allow
for arbitrary expressions. For this first step, it only handles native
sizes.

-- 
Kees Cook

RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by

[Ping-Ke Shih]

Hi Kees,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 12:56 AM
> To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Cc: kvalo@kernel.org; llvm@lists.linux.dev; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org; trix@redhat.com; nathan@kernel.org; ndesaulniers@google.com;
> gustavoars@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: coex: Annotate struct rtw89_btc_btf_set_slot_table with __counted_by
> 
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 01:20:43AM +0000, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 13:17 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > So, NACK this patch. I will prepare one or two patches for them next week.
> 
> Ah-ha; thank you!

I have sent two patches [1]. Please help to review and Cc people if needed. 

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20231011063725.25276-1-pkshih@realtek.com/T/#t