[net-next RFC PATCH 6/6] wifi: mt76: permit to load precal from NVMEM cell for mt7915

[Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>]

Permit to load precal from NVMEM cell for mt7915. The NVMEM cell must be
named "precal" to be correctly loaded.

NVMEM cell must already account the correct offset and be placed after
the EEPROM as the function expect the data right from the start.

Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---

I would like to have some hint of the cell name... Is it ok to use
precal? Should we use "precal-eeprom"?

---
 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/eeprom.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/eeprom.c
index 5228f710b3da..3bb2643d1b26 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/eeprom.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ static int mt7915_eeprom_load_precal(struct mt7915_dev *dev)
 	u8 *eeprom = mdev->eeprom.data;
 	u32 val = eeprom[MT_EE_DO_PRE_CAL];
 	u32 offs;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!dev->flash_mode)
 		return 0;
@@ -25,7 +26,11 @@ static int mt7915_eeprom_load_precal(struct mt7915_dev *dev)
 
 	offs = is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) ? MT_EE_PRECAL : MT_EE_PRECAL_V2;
 
-	return mt76_get_of_data_from_mtd(mdev, dev->cal, offs, val);
+	ret = mt76_get_of_data_from_mtd(mdev, dev->cal, offs, val);
+	if (!ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return mt76_get_of_data_from_nvmem(mdev, dev->cal, "precal", val);
 }
 
 static int mt7915_check_eeprom(struct mt7915_dev *dev)
-- 
2.40.1