From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: <kevin_yang@realtek.com>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] wifi: rwt89: consider RX info for WiFi 7 chips
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:44:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231027014402.9448-4-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231027014402.9448-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
For WiFi 7 chips, some fields and predefined length are changed, so
add them accordingly.
The mac_id field is used to identify peer that send a packet, and we can
use it to know RSSI and traffic from the peer. For WiFi 7 chips,
RXWD.mac_id of PPDU status packet is not set by hardware. Instead, we
should fill it by rxinfo_user[].mac_id of PPDU status content.
Also, filter out invalid reports to prevent warning messages keep showing.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/txrx.h | 4 ++
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index 6a70c035b22e..ac99434c0e66 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -1409,29 +1409,63 @@ static int rtw89_core_rx_process_mac_ppdu(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
{
const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
const struct rtw89_rxinfo *rxinfo = (const struct rtw89_rxinfo *)skb->data;
+ const struct rtw89_rxinfo_user *user;
+ enum rtw89_chip_gen chip_gen = rtwdev->chip->chip_gen;
+ int rx_cnt_size = RTW89_PPDU_MAC_RX_CNT_SIZE;
bool rx_cnt_valid = false;
+ bool invalid = false;
u8 plcp_size = 0;
- u8 usr_num = 0;
u8 *phy_sts;
+ u8 usr_num;
+ int i;
+
+ if (chip_gen == RTW89_CHIP_BE) {
+ invalid = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_W0_INVALID_V1);
+ rx_cnt_size = RTW89_PPDU_MAC_RX_CNT_SIZE_V1;
+ }
+
+ if (invalid)
+ return -EINVAL;
rx_cnt_valid = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_W0_RX_CNT_VLD);
- plcp_size = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w1, RTW89_RXINFO_W1_PLCP_LEN) << 3;
- usr_num = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_W0_USR_NUM);
+ if (chip_gen == RTW89_CHIP_BE) {
+ plcp_size = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_W0_PLCP_LEN_V1) << 3;
+ usr_num = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_W0_USR_NUM_V1);
+ } else {
+ plcp_size = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w1, RTW89_RXINFO_W1_PLCP_LEN) << 3;
+ usr_num = le32_get_bits(rxinfo->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_W0_USR_NUM);
+ }
if (usr_num > chip->ppdu_max_usr) {
rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "Invalid user number (%d) in mac info\n",
usr_num);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ /* For WiFi 7 chips, RXWD.mac_id of PPDU status is not set by hardware,
+ * so update mac_id by rxinfo_user[].mac_id.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < usr_num && chip_gen == RTW89_CHIP_BE; i++) {
+ user = &rxinfo->user[i];
+ if (!le32_get_bits(user->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_USER_MAC_ID_VALID))
+ continue;
+
+ phy_ppdu->mac_id =
+ le32_get_bits(user->w0, RTW89_RXINFO_USER_MACID);
+ break;
+ }
+
phy_sts = skb->data + RTW89_PPDU_MAC_INFO_SIZE;
phy_sts += usr_num * RTW89_PPDU_MAC_INFO_USR_SIZE;
/* 8-byte alignment */
if (usr_num & BIT(0))
phy_sts += RTW89_PPDU_MAC_INFO_USR_SIZE;
if (rx_cnt_valid)
- phy_sts += RTW89_PPDU_MAC_RX_CNT_SIZE;
+ phy_sts += rx_cnt_size;
phy_sts += plcp_size;
+ if (phy_sts > skb->data + skb->len)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
phy_ppdu->buf = phy_sts;
phy_ppdu->len = skb->data + skb->len - phy_sts;
@@ -1565,6 +1599,11 @@ static int rtw89_core_rx_process_phy_ppdu(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
{
const struct rtw89_phy_sts_hdr *hdr = phy_ppdu->buf;
u32 len_from_header;
+ bool physts_valid;
+
+ physts_valid = le32_get_bits(hdr->w0, RTW89_PHY_STS_HDR_W0_VALID);
+ if (!physts_valid)
+ return -EINVAL;
len_from_header = le32_get_bits(hdr->w0, RTW89_PHY_STS_HDR_W0_LEN) << 3;
@@ -2054,13 +2093,19 @@ static void rtw89_core_rx_process_ppdu_sts(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
.mac_id = desc_info->mac_id};
int ret;
- if (desc_info->mac_info_valid)
- rtw89_core_rx_process_mac_ppdu(rtwdev, skb, &phy_ppdu);
+ if (desc_info->mac_info_valid) {
+ ret = rtw89_core_rx_process_mac_ppdu(rtwdev, skb, &phy_ppdu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+ }
+
ret = rtw89_core_rx_process_phy_ppdu(rtwdev, &phy_ppdu);
if (ret)
- rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_TXRX, "process ppdu failed\n");
+ goto out;
rtw89_core_rx_process_phy_sts(rtwdev, &phy_ppdu);
+
+out:
rtw89_core_rx_pending_skb(rtwdev, &phy_ppdu, desc_info, skb);
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 2eb29ea9ff7b..da8181539d1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -2818,6 +2818,7 @@ struct rtw89_ra_info {
#define RTW89_PPDU_MAC_INFO_USR_SIZE 4
#define RTW89_PPDU_MAC_INFO_SIZE 8
#define RTW89_PPDU_MAC_RX_CNT_SIZE 96
+#define RTW89_PPDU_MAC_RX_CNT_SIZE_V1 128
#define RTW89_MAX_RX_AGG_NUM 64
#define RTW89_MAX_TX_AGG_NUM 128
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/txrx.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/txrx.h
index 7142cce167de..c467a80ffa88 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/txrx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/txrx.h
@@ -416,8 +416,11 @@ struct rtw89_rxinfo {
} __packed;
#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_USR_NUM GENMASK(3, 0)
+#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_USR_NUM_V1 GENMASK(4, 0)
#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_FW_DEFINE GENMASK(15, 8)
+#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_PLCP_LEN_V1 GENMASK(23, 16)
#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_LSIG_LEN GENMASK(27, 16)
+#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_INVALID_V1 BIT(27)
#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_IS_TO_SELF BIT(28)
#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_RX_CNT_VLD BIT(29)
#define RTW89_RXINFO_W0_LONG_RXD GENMASK(31, 30)
@@ -430,6 +433,7 @@ struct rtw89_phy_sts_hdr {
} __packed;
#define RTW89_PHY_STS_HDR_W0_IE_MAP GENMASK(4, 0)
+#define RTW89_PHY_STS_HDR_W0_VALID BIT(7)
#define RTW89_PHY_STS_HDR_W0_LEN GENMASK(15, 8)
#define RTW89_PHY_STS_HDR_W0_RSSI_AVG GENMASK(31, 24)
#define RTW89_PHY_STS_HDR_W1_RSSI_A GENMASK(7, 0)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-27 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-27 1:43 [PATCH 0/4] wifi: rtw89: update address CAM size and PPDU parser to support WiFi 7 chips Ping-Ke Shih
2023-10-27 1:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] wifi: rtw89: set entry size of address CAM to H2C field by chip Ping-Ke Shih
2023-10-27 1:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] wifi: rtw89: configure PPDU max user " Ping-Ke Shih
2023-10-27 1:44 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2023-10-27 1:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] wifi: rtw89: extend PHY status parser to support WiFi 7 chips Ping-Ke Shih
2023-10-27 1:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] wifi: rtw89: update address CAM size and PPDU " Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231027014402.9448-4-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=kevin_yang@realtek.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).