From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F99481C7; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706027719; cv=none; b=Bqc37FsS/YpbYxWjvZl3cIcOQEsmmKkF6Yp3QCcfur7tRDM1Qt3rVCM0vCTFziEaYq/BM6JACq0wFGX2VXPT16WZiH5mBCTeDCb5bF/fnDkaezserwhOYxt7kWaH+NB0zIQA6Gs0zAyO97xs/qndKgLk+dGr1jApXcjTXSinlKc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706027719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dirBhJb++RfdMmFcy8NH21TggXMpcKpGnGyZJmfGj2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ctjif3y2c61Ct9LMxmS8Y4DCe5a8PJh0XTzWO4GSlpsA5hNP2h/ZA+Uej9Q0WHP74McG6Pb6ZtuzKrD5MO9r1MBZUp/JSg+jtcuAAVZWB7zVc+xKCaPCfawZGi+BEjCiErlirnUbk/ywi+QsYTw2IDE6VVf6t6hr7Od+nnNXipQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Bgb3t6oN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Bgb3t6oN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CDC8C433F1; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706027719; bh=dirBhJb++RfdMmFcy8NH21TggXMpcKpGnGyZJmfGj2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Bgb3t6oNqQklxoS3kD9UsjIAU2xSqLc74I3cUzAkvRGKDyhcBObvVOvIb1Cp8SajF nXb6rjRLkIVVagcMwnUXoSIK3c9H8gqCtrNtdAKqKYAFWiGvwsxzXMouaRg1ixAvrQ iifQtGdcoKTE7nggh9XGVPW5FVkbBJmjfRqmq4bBHM3T2rft2tfeoAee56NMo/CY6X KwyMowS1Cjm1LrZznAGWwEFDZ0xDWjtQPy964hbNR7YrzGmE/QayW+b2nf83QzMjuA hs08ZEFUPOLAmoRFX7iryd2gPGRUK7rYI3c3+PzfHrgI2w/EAmcfG1yOVvM0PJgGaD kjanORY4L6Cfg== Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:35:17 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Breno Leitao Cc: davem@davemloft.net, abeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org, weiwan@google.com, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/22] Fix MODULE_DESCRIPTION() for net (p2) Message-ID: <20240123083517.2982c483@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240122184543.2501493-1-leitao@debian.org> <20240122105708.52d33fa0@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:25:28 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > > When you repost: > > - please send these 3 to linux-wireless as a separate series > > - make sure mailing lists are CCed on the cover letter > > (yes, get_maintainer is embarrassingly bad at its job) > > - please send 10 at-a-time, it's probably a good tradeoff > > between series size and reposting risk > > - please target net, I hope I convinced Paolo that it's okay :) > > Sure. I will split this series in 3 and target `net`. The wireless ones need to target wireless, just to be clear. The rest should fit into 2 series. > I suppose it is OK to send the patchsets in parallel, instead of waiting > for the first patchset to be reviewed/accepted before sending the second > part. Is this correct? The rate limit is to avoid having to give the same feedback to multiple series, among other things. it'd be better to send one part at a time.. it won't take that long :)